Skip to content
Halaby Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Halaby Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$233kCivil Rights$19kReligion$12kInternational$11kArts & Culture$9kHealth$7kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $100
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALHEDAYAH ACADEMY$100,000
OMS LIFE FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $2k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%MASJID A NOOR: $6k → 8%DFW ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $5k → 11%ALDEWAN ALARABI: $9k → 14%COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS: $1k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 → 7%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $1k → 10%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $50k → 17%SALEEMA FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%DOWN SYNDROME GUILD OF DALLAS: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $100 → 10%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $50k → 17%EIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $4k → 11%DOWN SYNDROME GUILD OF DALLAS: $1k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $25k → 17%EIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $2k → 11%EIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $2k → 11%EIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $1k → 11%THE SALVATION ARMY FAMILY STORE & DONATION CENTER: $2k → 11%THE SALVATION ARMY FAMILY STORE & DONATION CENTER: $2k → 11%MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 11%ALHEDAYAH ACADEMY: $100k → 11%ALHEDAYAH ACADEMY: $500 → 11%MANSFIELD ISLAMIC CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$262k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+60%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
HealthInternationalEducationCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT
    3× · 2018–2021 · $125k · revenue +4%
  • AJ
    A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE
    3× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +215%
  • DS
    Down Syndrome Guild of Dallas
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALDEWAN ALARABI
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue -59%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MI
    MANSFIELD ISLAMIC CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
Al-Mawrid United States Inc

The Organization is a foundation for Islamic research and education.

Religion
3
American Muslim Community Foundation

The American Muslim Community Foundation cultivates donor giving and diversified funding to advance charitable causes and programs.

Philanthropy
4
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
5
Arab Foundations Forum Usa

(See Schedule O)

Education
6
Masjidullah Incorporated

The mission of Masjidullah is to establish the Holy Qur'an as the guide book for all of humanity and the life of prophet Muhammad as the example for human conduct. Masjidullah carries out its mission through programs of community service…

Religion
7
Rene Moawad Foundation

Provide Humanitarian Aid

International
8
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee ADC is a civil rights organization committed to defending the rights of people of Arab descent and promoting their rich cultural heritage.

—
9
Mali Medical Relief Fund

We serve needy families in Mali who find themselves in medical crisis. Since our founding in 2008, we have helped hundreds of patients access life saving medical care, by paying for medicines, medical tests, and surgeries. We treat complex…

Food & Nutrition
10
Muslims for Progressive Values

Mpv is creating a culture rooted in human rights in muslim societies in the u.s. and around the world.

Religion
11
Arab Watch Coalition

Empowering and activating the role of the civil society in the arab region to influence the policies, programs and projects of international financial institutions in the region to achieve effective inclusive, participatory, equitable and…

Human Services
12
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Oms Life Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALHEDAYAH ACADEMY: $100,500 · OtherALHEDAYAH ACADEMYONENATION RELIEF AND CHARITY: $16,000 · OtherONENATION RELIEF AND CHARITYEIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $8,000 · OtherEIHEDAYA ISLAMIC SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherMANSFIELD ISLAMIC CENTER: $5,000 · OtherDFW ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $9,500 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $125,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUTALDEWAN ALARABI: $9,475 · Arts & CultureA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $3,100 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthThe OMS Life Foundation: $600 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $2,060 · Human ServicesMuslim Community Center for Human Services: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$149,500Education$125,000Arts & Culture$9,475International$4,100Health$3,700Human Services$2,060Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $3,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDown Syndrome Guild of Dallas: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $2,060 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuslim Community Center for Human Services: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSaleema Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe OMS Life Foundation: $600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Halaby Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Halaby Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Halaby Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home