Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hala Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$117kRecreation & Sports$32kHuman Services$25kHousing & Shelter$17kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$10,000
HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION$8,000
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$7,000
HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH$5,000
REALITIES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
MAKE A WISH COLORADO$4,000
MAKE A WISH HAWAII$4,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DENVER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NA KEIKI O EMALIA: $2k → 9%HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $7k → 7%MAKE A WISH COLORADO: $4k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%REALITIES FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DENVER: $4k → 12%NA KEIKI O EMALAI: $2k → 9%HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER: $8k → 9%ROUND UP RIVER RANCH: $5k → 7%MAKE A WISH CO: $3k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%REALITIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DENVER: $3k → 12%NA KEIKOI O EMIS: $2k → 9%HAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER: $8k → 9%ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $5k → 7%MAKE A WISH COLORADO: $3k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%REALITIES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 11%ROUNALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 12%NA KEIKI O EMALAI: $2k → 9%HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $5k → 7%MAKE A WISH COLORADO: $3k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%REALITIES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 12%NA KEIKI O EMALAI: $2k → 9%HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER: $8k → 9%ROUND UP RIVER RANCH: $5k → 7%MAKE A WISH COLORADO: $3k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 12%HAWAII CHILDRENS CANCER: $8k → 9%ROUND UP RIVER RANCH: $5k → 7%MAKE A WISH COLORADO: $3k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 12%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $5k → 9%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $3k → 9%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $3k → 9%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $3k → 9%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $3k → 9%MAUI STRONG: $3k → 9%HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 12 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -60% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$218k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-60%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $32k · revenue +55%
  • RF
    REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21k · revenue +109%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROUNALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • NK
    NA KEIKOI O EMIS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kaua'i Medical Clinic

Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…

Health
2
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
3
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
4
Kapi'olani Health Foundation

The mission of kapi'olani health foundation is to create a healthier hawai'i.

Health
5
Kuakini Foundation

The mission of kuakini foundation is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs;…

—
6
Make-a-Wish Foundation of America

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
7
Make-a-Wish Foundation of San Diego

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
8
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
9
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Montana Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of montana creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
12
Kapi'olani Medical Specialists

Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Hawaii; the most unlike its peers is Hawai'i Pacific Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $34,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherHAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATIONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $7,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DENVER: $6,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DENVERNA KEIKI O EMALAI: $4,500 · Other+4 more: $8,000 · Other+4 moreChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $18,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foun…Hawai'i Pacific Health: $18,000 · HealthHawai'i Pacific HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII: $16,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAIIMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $14,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORAD…ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $32,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER R…REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES: $21,000 · PhilanthropyREALITIES F…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMM…
Other$106,000Health$67,000Recreation & Sports$32,000Philanthropy$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $32,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES: $21,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $18,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHawai'i Pacific Health: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII: $16,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNA KEIKI O EMALIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hawai'i Pacific Health ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NA KEIKI O EMALIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hala Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hala Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hala’s filings →

    More from the funding graph