Skip to content
Hal F Juckette Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hal F Juckette Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$475kReligion$409kHuman Services$290kFood & Nutrition$140kRecreation & Sports$127kHousing & Shelter$102kAnimals$87kEmployment$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
$20,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$39,900
CHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$27,500
HOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION$27,500
GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA$20,500
FRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
CHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNITY INC$3,100
CHILLICOTHE THEATRE CO$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OATS TRANSIT: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 24 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+70%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $272k · revenue +105%
  • CE
    CHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +14%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    4× · 2019–2023 · $103k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +484%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHILLICOTHE PARKS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chillicothe Area Chamber of Commerce Association

Economic development in chillicothe, missouri.

—
2
Elderly Housing Corporation of Clay County Mn

To provide low income housing for those in need.

—
3
Clay County Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for lost, stray & abandoned animals in clay county

Animals
4
Christian Village Inc

The provision of affordable housing and services to the elderly and infirm in need of skilled and intermediate nursing care and independent living

Health
5
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
6
Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

Human Services
7
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
8
Chillicothe Country Club

Providing social and recreational activities for members

—
9
Community Memorial Health Center

Nursing home and assisted living care for the elderly.

Health
10
Hospice of Chenango County Inc

To provide end of life care and bereavement counseling to the terminally ill and their families in chenango county, new york.

—
11
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
12
Livingston County Community Development Corporation

The focus of main street chillicothe is to enhance the vitality of the downtown by preservation of its architectural, commercial, and cultural heritage. these objectives are accomplished through education and community awareness of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concerned Citizens for the Communit; the most unlike its peers is Kelly Poling Arts District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $272,000 · OtherGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INCCHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $176,185 · OtherCHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCEHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION: $171,617 · OtherHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSIONCHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $147,515 · OtherCHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICTCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $83,000 · OtherCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $61,500 · OtherHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC: $60,000 · OtherCHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $42,600 · Other+14 more: $189,712 · Other+14 moreCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $225,000 · EducationCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIO…COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $102,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARK…+1 more: $10,242 · EducationVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $50,000 · Public BenefitLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitCENTRAL MISSOURI HONOR FLIGHT INC: $17,500 · Public BenefitLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $54,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER: $32,500 · AnimalsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $71,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIVINGSTON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL AND HOUSING COUNCIL: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT: $64,766 · Food & NutritionCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,204,129Education$337,742Public Benefit$92,500Animals$87,000Youth Development$79,000Food & Nutrition$64,766Housing & Shelter$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $272,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $102,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $71,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT: $64,766 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $54,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $42,600 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER: $32,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $30,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HONOR FLIGHT INC: $17,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $10,242 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetGREENHILLS SOCCER CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetOATS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL CORNER ART GUILD AND GALLERY: $7,500 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL AND HOUSING COUNCIL: $7,500 over 2y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,917 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mervyn W Jenkins Foun…Joe and Lenore Lamber…Roger a Browning Foun…Livingston County Com…Minnie B Hedrick TrustCarl C & Ardath Hudna…James Allbritain Laws…Fm & Gladys McCall Fo…Mfa Oil FoundationAmazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Mervyn W Jenkins FoundationMO36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mervyn W Jenkins Foundation · Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation · Roger a Browning Foundation Inc · Livingston County Community Foundation · Minnie B Hedrick Trust · Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation · James Allbritain Lawson Charitable Trust · Fm & Gladys McCall Foundation · Mfa Oil Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hal F Juckette Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hal F Juckette Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hal F Juckette Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hal F Juckette Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hal F Juckette Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home