Skip to content

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity of New York State Inc

To promote the mission and work of habitat for humanity in new york state.

$798k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$129k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$7.2MAnimals$147kPublic Benefit$84kEnvironment$59k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $606k
$51,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$687k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM$129,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLUMBIA$129,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TOMPK$115,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NEWBUR$115,000
STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU$66,625
SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$51,000
CHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU$42,625
NIAGARA AREA HABITAT FOR HUMA$42,000
BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM$42,000
GLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR$33,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA$31,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DUTCH: $57k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ONTAR: $61k → 10%LIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR: $59k → 11%GLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR: $65k → 11%SOUTHEASTERN STEUBEN COUNTY H: $84k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $364k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SENEC: $56k → 14%SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $62k → 14%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $279k → 14%CHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $85k → 15%ULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM: $129k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLUMBIA: $129k → 17%BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM: $56k → 20%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ONTAR: $60k → 10%LIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR: $59k → 11%GLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR: $62k → 11%STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $67k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $363k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SENEC: $56k → 14%SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $56k → 14%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $252k → 14%CHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $56k → 15%ULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM: $63k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLUMBIA: $62k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DUTCH: $61k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ONTAR: $57k → 10%GLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR: $57k → 11%STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $65k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $174k → 13%SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $56k → 14%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $239k → 14%CHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $56k → 15%ULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM: $59k → 16%GLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR: $57k → 11%STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $60k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $149k → 13%SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $51k → 14%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $217k → 14%STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $59k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $121k → 13%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $168k → 14%STEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $57k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $115k → 13%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $152k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $94k → 13%GREATER ROCHESTER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $65k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $62k → 13%FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMAN: $56k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 20 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$7.3M
$192k

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
  • FC
    FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +203%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NEWBUR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $895k

Funded once

  • SS
    SOUTHEASTERN STEUBEN COUNTY H
    one grant, 2018 · $84k
  • GR
    GREATER ROCHESTER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $65k
  • OC
    ONEIDA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM
    2× · 2017–2021 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFA: $1,472,830 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BUFFAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NEWBUR: $895,145 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NEWBURULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM: $397,449 · OtherULSTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMSTEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $336,106 · OtherSTEUBEN COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GENES: $308,190 · OtherCHEMUNG COUNTY HABITAT FOR HU: $299,388 · OtherGLENS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR: $273,418 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ONTAR: $272,515 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TOMPK: $261,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLUMBIA: $219,000 · OtherLIVINGSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR: $205,313 · Other+12 more: $963,144 · Other+12 moreFLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,363,000 · Housing & ShelterFLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR …SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $225,000 · Housing & ShelterSYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUM…
Other$5,903,998Housing & Shelter$1,588,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,363,000 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetSYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $225,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetBROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $98,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetCAYUGA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $56,486 over 2y, 36% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOME COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAYUGA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity International IncGA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of New York State Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habitat for Humanity of New York State Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Habitat for Humanity of New York State’s filings →

    More from the funding graph