Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haberling McLeroy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$209kReligion$188kHealth$105kInternational$51kHuman Services$35kRecreation & Sports$25kFood & Nutrition$25kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$592k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENT$41,000
ST PAUL THE APOSTLE CHURCH$30,000
VICTORIA COLLEGE$20,000
UHV SCHOLARSHIP FUND$20,000
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
DIOCESE OF VICTORIA$10,000
OUR LADY OF VICTORY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
SIT 'EM DOWN CHURCH$5,000
FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DIOCESE SERVICES APPEAL$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$3,500
VICTORIA STOCK SHOW BUYERS GROUP$2,000
YMCA OF THE GOLDEN CRESENT$2,000
ROTARTY CLUB OF SEGUIN$1,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 20%BLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 20%BLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 20%GABRIEL PROJECT OF THE CROSSROADS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$612k · 24 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$612k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+4%

Still filing today

29%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $51k · revenue +27% · 29% of their budget
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $33k
  • PF
    PAULIST FATHERS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • P7
    PT 73 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
2
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
3
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
4
Genetic Resource Association of Texas
Health
5
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
7
Credit Union of Texas Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Texas Cowboy Hall of Fame Inc
Arts & Culture
9
El Paso High School Alumni Museum

To maintain, design and operate a museum to celebrate the history of el paso high school, el paos, tx.

Arts & Culture
10
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
12
Abuelitos Foundation
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guadalupe Regional Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Seguin-Guadalupe County Heritage Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VICTORIA COLLEGE: $92,100 · OtherVICTORIA COLLEGESAINT VINCENT DE PAUL: $90,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DE PAULUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $66,666 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONST PAUL THE APOSTLE CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherST PAUL THE APOSTLE CHURCHFATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENT: $51,000 · OtherFATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENTHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCHHOLY FAMILY OF JOSEPH MARY & JESUS: $35,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY OF JOSEPH MARY & JESUSIndividual grant recipient: $33,333 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · Other+26 more: $146,090 · Other+26 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · EducationPT 73 FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OPRAH WINFREY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 · HealthGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 · HealthBLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH: $3,000 · Human ServicesGabriel Project of the Crossroads: $1,000 · Human ServicesChildrens Discovery Museum Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $1,200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$646,189Food & Nutrition$25,000Education$15,000Philanthropy$15,000Health$13,700Human Services$4,000Arts & Culture$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENT: $51,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $6,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE OPRAH WINFREY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRICEBIRD BOOSTER CLUB INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetChildrens Discovery Museum Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGabriel Project of the Crossroads: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FATHER DAN MORALES ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PT 73 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPRAH WINFREY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUEBONNET YOUTH RANCH ↗
  • Who funds RICEBIRD BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Discovery Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Gabriel Project of the Crossroads ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Wood Family Memorial Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haberling McLeroy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haberling McLeroy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Haberling McLeroy Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Haberling McLeroy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haberling McLeroy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph