Skip to content

· Private foundation

H&M Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$63kHousing & Shelter$34kArts & Culture$31kHealth$14kReligion$14kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $107k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Dream Center$23,500
The Jackson Symphony Association$23,500
University School of Jackson$20,000
Union University$10,000
American Heart Association$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Regional Interfaith Association$10,000
University of Tennessee$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Jackson-Madison County Sports Hall of Fame$3,000
Young Life$3,000
Mayo Clinic$2,500
Jackson-Madison County Humane Socie$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%The Dream Center: $24k → 15%THE DREAM CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 11 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$176k
$8k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    Jackson Symphony Association
    2× · 2023–2024 · $31k · revenue +12%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +3%
  • UU
    UNION UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • WT
    WEST TENNESSEE HEALTHCARE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johnson University

Johnson university is a private, coeducational institution of higher learning offering associate, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees.

Education
2
United Way of Jackson County

United way of jackson county (uwjc) is dedicated to creating a community rich in opportunities to eliminate poverty and allow all people to achieve financial stability and success. this emphasis on financial stability includes meeting…

—
3
Jackson County Economic Development Foundation Inc

Improving the economic development opportunities of jackson county, mississippi by unifying planning, economic & industrial development, and marketing activities in the county.

Community Improvement
4
Jackson County Chamber of Commerce

To be a leading driver and advocate for community and economic development in jackson county.

—
5
Jackson Community Ambulance

The mission of jackson community ambulance is to provide high-quality out-of-hospital care and transportation services to the communities we serve.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Community Foundation of Jackson Hole

To improve lives through philanthropic leadership

Philanthropy
8
Simpson University

Simpson university is a christ-centered learning community committed to developing each student in mind, faith, and character for a life-time of meaningful work and service in a constantly changing world.

Education
9
St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson
—
10
Johnson College

Johnson college provides real-world, hands-on learning in a caring environment and prepares graduates to enter into or advance in their careers.

Education
11
Jackson Family Childcare

To provide high quality, comprehensive child development and after school care to ensure that children can reach their highest potential

—
12
Jackson Community Development Corp

Our vision is to seek the wholistic wellbeing of the Jackson neighborhood, where residents are known, valued, and empowered to collaborate for the thriving of its people and place.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University School of Jackson; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION INC: $13,500 · OtherREGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION IN…University of Tennessee: $13,000 · OtherUniversity of TennesseeIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONJACKSON-MADISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIE: $2,500 · OtherMayo Clinic: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSONUNION UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERSITYThe Dream Center: $33,500 · Human ServicesThe Dream CenterJackson Symphony Association: $31,000 · Arts & CultureJackson Symphony …American Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentJackson-Madison County Sports Hall of Fame: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$62,000Education$50,000Human Services$33,500Arts & Culture$31,000Health$10,000Youth Development$5,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Dream Center: $33,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetJackson Symphony Association: $31,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJackson-Madison County Sports Hall of Fame: $5,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Dream Center ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Jackson-Madison County Sports Hall of Fame ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Tn Healthcare Foundation IncTN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Tn Healthcare Foundation Inc · James E Campbell Family Foundation 26-3889180 · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H&M Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H&M Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H&M Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to H&M Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H&M’s filings →

    More from the funding graph