Skip to content

· Private foundation

H & H Van Klaveren Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$209k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$929kReligion$530kCommunity Improvement$131kInternational$115kHealth$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kFood & Nutrition$28kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DORDT COLLEGE$60,000
MISSION INDIA$34,000
PARTNERS WORLDWIDE$29,000
LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL$17,500
SAMARITANS PURSE INT RELIEF$17,500
CENTRAL CATHOLIC FFA$15,000
ST JUDE$5,500
COMMUNITY HOSPICE$3,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,500
DARBY BRILLIANT BEGINNINGS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PLANT A SEED FOUNDATION$2,000
VALLEY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,000
RESTORE MERCED$1,500
AGAPE FLIGHT INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADERA RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 22%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 8%MADERA RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 22%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 8%HOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $2k → 19%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 8%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $1k → 19%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 8%HOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%LIVING WATER INTL: $3k → 8%HOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%LIVING WATER INTL: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 15%TRINITY PREGENANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 22%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $3k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $2k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $2k → 15%COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
OR
SD
IA
IN
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 37 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
13

Total granted

$1.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-24%

Still filing today

49%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DORDT UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $840k · revenue +66%
  • PW
    PARTNERS WORLDWIDE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +37%
  • TL
    THE LUKE SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $70k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • WR
    WORLD RENEW CRWRC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
5
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
6
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
7
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International
10
Joy in the Harvest

To serve Christ by providing expertise, resources, and leadership to help the church make Christian Disciples in foreign lands, and to render assistance to the poor, sick, and needy in our places of service.

Religion
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Luke Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fairmont Ag Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DORDT UNIVERSITY: $840,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITYKUYPER COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationKUYPER COLLEGEMISSION INDIA: $207,000 · OtherMISSION INDIABACK TO GOD HOUR MINISTRIES: $110,000 · OtherBACK TO GOD HOUR MINISTRIESBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $99,500 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESTHE LUKE SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · OtherTHE LUKE SOCIETY INCSAMARITANS PURSE INT RELIEF: $57,500 · OtherSAMARITANS PURSE INT RELIEFWorld Renew: $35,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC FFA: $25,000 · Other+27 more: $109,605 · Other+27 morePARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $127,000 · InternationalAgape Flights Inc: $6,250 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $6,000 · InternationalLiving Water International: $63,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $21,750 · Human ServicesHOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Human Services+3 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,000 · HealthThe Light-House Recovery Program Inc: $5,400 · HealthPLANT A SEED FOUNDATION: $8,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionMULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES: $2,500 · ReligionRestore Merced: $4,000 · Community Improvement
Education$920,000Other$713,605International$139,250Human Services$93,250Health$26,900Religion$15,500Community Improvement$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $840,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $127,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetKUYPER COLLEGE: $80,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LUKE SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLiving Water International: $63,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Renew: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $21,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANT A SEED FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetAgape Flights Inc: $6,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Light-House Recovery Program Inc: $5,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRestore Merced: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTrinity Pregnancy Resource Center: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADERA RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds KUYPER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE LUKE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗
  • Who funds World Renew ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANT A SEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Agape Flights Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Light-House Recovery Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Restore Merced ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAIRMONT AG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Vanderark Foundation · Stewardship Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H & H Van Klaveren Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H & H Van Klaveren Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H & H Van Klaveren Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to H & H Van Klaveren Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H & H Van Klaveren Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph