Skip to content

· Private foundation

Guy Reno Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$318k
Granted FY2026still arriving
35
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$446kHuman Services$363kPhilanthropy$289kRecreation & Sports$237kEducation$208kAnimals$199kEnvironment$181kHousing & Shelter$154kOther$0
02FY2026 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k25 grants · $133k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$60,000
SEVERSON DELLS NATURE CENTER$25,000
PATRIOTS GATEWAY CENTER$20,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY$15,000
ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION$15,000
CRUSADER COMMUNITY HEALTH$10,000
ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE$10,000
BURPEE MUSEUM$10,000
RAMP$10,000
NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$9,000
SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES$9,000
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $2k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $2k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $2k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $2k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $5k → 15%YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $5k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $4k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $3k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $3k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $3k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $3k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $2k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $2k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $2k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $20k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $8k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%THE CARPENTER'S PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $5k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $4k → 15%ROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $2k → 15%ROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $2k → 15%ROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $2k → 15%ROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 55 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2026, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
10

Total granted

$2.8M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $115k · revenue +31%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $93k · revenue +98%
  • RA
    REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $85k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • YO
    YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $20k · revenue +55%
  • DP
    DISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -34%
  • SH
    SwedishAmerican Health Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
3
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
4
Rock Island Economic Growth Corporation

The mission of rock island economic growth corporation is to renovate and build new single family or multi-family housing in the midwest region; to foster low-income housing that: enhances the overall image and economic vitality of the…

Housing & Shelter
5
Rockford Area Economic Development Council Inc

The rockford area economic development council cultivates opportunities for primary job growth that increase the economic well-being of our region

—
6
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
7
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

—
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Community Action Inc of Rock & Walworth Counties

At community action we provide access and opportunity for those we serve and those who support our efforts. through innovative programs and strong community partnerships we eliminate barriers, establishing clear pathways to economic…

Community Improvement
10
Rockbridge Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Provide affordable housing solutions for low-income families.

—
11
Rockford Regional Health Council

Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

—
12
Rockford Sexual Assault Counseling Inc

Rockford sexual assault counseling, inc. (rsac) responds to the needs of victims of sexual assault/abuse and their families/significant others through emergency services, emotional support, counseling, referral, advocacy, and education,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Rescue Mission Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Schuyler County Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $323,018 · OtherUNITED WAYPATRIOTS GATEWAY CENTER: $245,000 · OtherPATRIOTS GATEWAY CENTERK CANCER BASEBALL: $160,000 · OtherK CANCER BASEBALLYMCA: $130,000 · OtherYMCACOURT STREET METHODIST CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC: $85,000 · OtherCRUSADER COMMUNITY HEALTH: $83,000 · OtherZION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $73,000 · Other+38 more: $852,285 · Other+38 moreCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $51,500 · Human ServicesROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $45,000 · Human ServicesWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $43,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $21,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $16,000 · Human ServicesROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $11,000 · Human ServicesYWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $145,588 · EnvironmentROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $115,000 · AnimalsHOO HAVEN INC: $28,000 · AnimalsMISSION WOLF: $12,000 · Animals+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES: $50,000 · HealthTHE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD: $42,520 · HealthSwedishAmerican Hospital: $20,000 · HealthETHAN LINDBERG FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS BLOOD BANK INC D/B/A ROCK RIVER VALLEY BLOOD CENTER: $5,000 · HealthROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $34,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $93,000 · International
Other$2,041,303Human Services$223,500Environment$175,588Animals$160,000Health$122,520Education$119,000International$93,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetK CANCER BASEBALL: $160,000 over 7y, 59% of budgetNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $145,588 over 10y, 1.4% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $115,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $93,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC: $85,000 over 10y, 0.4% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetZION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $73,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $51,500 over 10y, 0.4% of budgetREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES: $50,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $44,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $43,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD: $42,520 over 10y, 1.2% of budgetTHE LITERACY COUNCIL: $38,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetROCK HOUSE KIDS: $35,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSCHUYLER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHOO HAVEN INC: $28,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES: $22,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSwedishAmerican Hospital: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION WOLF: $12,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY CLUB OF ROCKFORD: $12,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetROCKFORD DAY NURSERY: $11,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetDISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILESTONE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISS CARLY'S INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPAWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds K CANCER BASEBALL ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ZION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds THE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ROCK HOUSE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHUYLER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOO HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL51× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · John & Linda Anderson Charitable Foundation · Jeffrey R Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Ben Harding Family Foundation · Ralph J Baudhuin Foundation · United Way of Rock River Valley · Sjostrom & Sons Foundation · Blazer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guy Reno Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guy Reno Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Guy Reno Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Guy Reno Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Guy Reno Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph