Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gutgsell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$92kHealth$22kYouth Development$14kReligion$9kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$2k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$529k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UWSP FOUNDATION$7,765
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MOTHER AND FAMILIES PROGRAM$7,265
360 YOUTH SERVICES$3,265
RUSH COPLEY FOUNDATION$3,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$2,000
DR THOMAS WITT RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE$1,500
LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 7%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 7%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 7%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 7 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$123k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+30%

Still filing today

57%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $68k · revenue +2%
  • 3Y
    360 YOUTH SERVICES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +38%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • ME
    MCDILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • WC
    WOODLANDS CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SP
    STEVENS POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $67,930 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES MOTHER AND FAMILIES PROGRAM: $7,265 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES MOTHER …DR THOMAS WITT RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherDR THOMAS WITT RESEARCH FO…ST MARY'S CHURCH: $5,505 · OtherST MARY'S CHURCHMCDILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherMCDILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOODLANDS CHURCH: $3,400 · OtherWOODLANDS CHURCHSTEVENS POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,000 · OtherSTEVENS POINT SCHOOL DISTR…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherRush Copley Foundation: $20,320 · HealthRush Copley Found…Rush University Medical Center: $2,000 · HealthRush University M…360 YOUTH SERVICES: $12,985 · Human Services360 YOUTH SERVIC…LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,629 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES …MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOU…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $1,500 · Youth Development
Education$67,930Other$34,170Health$22,320Human Services$21,614Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $67,930 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRush Copley Foundation: $20,320 over 4y, 0.3% of budget360 YOUTH SERVICES: $12,985 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,629 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rush Copley Foundation ↗
  • Who funds 360 YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gutgsell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gutgsell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gutgsell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph