Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gupta Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$291kHealth$236kReligion$111kEducation$87kInternational$45kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IHCC$100,000
Sankara Eye Foundation$25,000
Ekal Vidyalaya$25,000
Grinnell College$10,000
HTCC$10,000
OpenStax$10,000
C3 Steam$2,000
One Voice DSM$1,000
Sikhs of Iowa Khalsa Heritage$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 8 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$615k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+40%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CULTUREALL INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $250k · revenue +117%
  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    6× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +68%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IH
    INDIAN HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • IE
    IOWA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +40%
  • MS
    MAINFRAME STUDIOS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
3
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
4
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
5
India Community Center Inc

The india community center's mission is to promote indian culture and values by providing social, cultural, recreational, and community programs thereby uniting the indian community and raising awareness about indian culture in the local…

International
6
Development Data Lab Inc

DDL`s Work is designed to widen public access to and use of economic, demographic and physical data that describes, defines and seeks to alleviate poverty, especially in the developing world

International
7
India Philanthropy Alliance Association

The india philanthropy alliance (ipa) is a nonprofit dedicated to accelerating the scale and impact of private american philanthropy to benefit social and economic development in india.

Philanthropy
8
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
9
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
10
International Crops Research Institute

To reduce poverty, hunger, malnutrition and environmental degradation in the dryland tropics

International
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
India Association of Central Connecticut Inc

To sustain and support indian culture

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sankara Eye Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Mainframe Studios. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IHCC: $100,000 · OtherIHCCHINDU TEMPLE AND CULTURE CENTER: $60,001 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE AND CULTURE CENTERGRINNELL COLLEGE: $50,000 · OtherGRINNELL COLLEGEINDIAN HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER: $40,000 · OtherINDIAN HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTEREkal Vidyalaya: $25,000 · OtherEkal VidyalayaHINDU TEMPLE & CULTURAL CENTER OF I: $20,001 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE & CULTURAL CENTER OF I+5 more: $24,000 · Other+5 moreCULTUREALL INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureCULTUREALL INC+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $135,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDA…EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $35,000 · InternationalINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $10,000 · InternationalAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $35,000 · Food & NutritionDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $30,000 · Human ServicesIOWA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $1,000 · Environment
Other$319,002Arts & Culture$251,000Health$135,000International$45,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Human Services$30,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCULTUREALL INC: $250,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $135,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIOWA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAINFRAME STUDIOS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CULTUREALL INC ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MAINFRAME STUDIOS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gupta Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gupta Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gupta Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gupta Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gupta Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph