Skip to content
Gulf Coast Partnership Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Gulf Coast Partnership Inc

To prevent homelessness in charlotte county.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$898k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$5.2MHuman Services$142k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,811,340, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,297,540 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $486,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $232k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$270,866
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DEPAUL CARES$897,634
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$365,499
CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE$270,866
ALL RAINBOW AND ALLIED YOUTH INC$142,406
CENTER FOR ABUSE AND RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC (CARE)$89,234
CHARLOTTE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS$45,701
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $797k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $566k → 9%JEWISH FAMILIES AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $48k → 9%ST VINCENT DEPAUL CARES: $142k → 12%JEWISH FAMILIES AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $41k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 9 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$7.0M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
0%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +54% · 30% of their budget
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +30%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $931k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • AR
    All Rainbow and Allied Youth
    one grant, 2025 · $142k
  • CC
    CHARLOTTE COUNTY BOARD OF CO
    one grant, 2025 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc

The purpose of the organization is to transform the lives of homeless men, women, and children by providing crucial services to end their crisis of homelessness.

—
2
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
3
Central Florida Commission On Homelessness Inc

The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.

—
4
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
5
Catholic Charities Diocese of St Petersburg Inc

Catholic charities serves with charity and compassion to promote the sanctity and dignity of all people with god. as a member of church, catholic charities offers hope by helping those in need and unites with others in service.

Human Services
6
Charis Group Inc

Emergency crisis relief

Religion
7
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
8
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
9
Changing Homelessness Inc

The organization was established for the purposes of coordinating emergency and homeless services in the jacksonville, florida area. the organization provides a collaborative community response to the needs of people living in crisis,…

Human Services
10
Block Love Charlotte

Community service

—
11
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Christian Service Center for Central Florida Inc

To create housing solutions, provide compassionate homeless day services, and work alongside partners to inspire community action.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlotte County Homeless Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for Abuse & Rape Emergencies of Charlotte County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC: $2,575,081 · OtherCHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INCST VINCENT DE PAUL: $659,805 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: $333,649 · OtherBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $328,664 · OtherCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC+1 more: $45,701 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC: $1,039,953 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SO…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $931,268 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VE…Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: $88,963 · Human ServicesCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC: $642,821 · HealthCHARLOTTE …JESUS LOVES YOU MINISTRY INC: $371,130 · Housing & ShelterAll Rainbow and Allied Youth: $142,406 · Youth Development
Other$3,942,900Human Services$2,060,184Health$642,821Housing & Shelter$371,130Youth Development$142,406

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC: $2,575,081 over 5y, 30% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC: $1,039,953 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $931,268 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC: $642,821 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJESUS LOVES YOU MINISTRY INC: $371,130 over 4y, 42% of budgetCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $328,664 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetJewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: $88,963 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community …The Community Foundat…Charlotte Community F…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Charlotte Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gulf Coast Partnership Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gulf Coast Partnership Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Charlotte County Homeless Coalition Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gulf Coast Partnership Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gulf Coast Partnership Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gulf Coast Partnership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home