Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Gulf Coast Partnership Inc

Gulf coast partnership, inc.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$566k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Housing & Shelter$5.2MHuman Services$142k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $1,331,109 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,238,871 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $907,762 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $393k
  • $250k+2 grants · $890k
$173,811
Median grant
1
States reached
$801k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$565,769
HOMELESS COALITION$324,707
CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE$173,811
ST VINCENT DEPAUL CARES$142,319
CENTER FOR ABUSE AND RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC (CARE)$76,472
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS$48,031
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $797k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $566k → 9%JEWISH FAMILIES AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $48k → 9%ST VINCENT DEPAUL CARES: $142k → 12%JEWISH FAMILIES AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $41k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 7 repeat orgs$708k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$4.6M
$708k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+8%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $708k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +54% · 30% of their budget
  • CB
    CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $372k · revenue +46%
  • JL
    JESUS LOVES YOU MINISTRY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $371k · revenue +87% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $566k · revenue +8%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $142k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC — $2,575,081 · OtherCHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INCST VINCENT DE PAUL — $659,805 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — $333,649 · OtherBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC — $239,430 · OtherCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC — $565,769 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITI…SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC — $142,319 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VI…Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc — $88,963 · Human ServicesJewish Family & …CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC — $371,955 · HealthJESUS LOVES YOU MINISTRY INC — $371,130 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,807,965Human Services$797,051Health$371,955Housing & Shelter$371,130

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARLOTTE COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC — $2,575,081 over 5y, 30% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC — $565,769 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC — $371,955 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJESUS LOVES YOU MINISTRY INC — $371,130 over 4y, 42% of budgetCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC — $239,430 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC — $142,319 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc — $88,963 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Charlotte Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gulf Coast Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc78% of income from government
  • Charlotte County Homeless Coalition Inc13% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gulf Coast Partnership Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gulf Coast Partnership Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph