Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gsr Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Civil Rights$105kReligion$7kEnvironment$6kInternational$4kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$2kCrime & Legal$1kHealth$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$6,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$14,000
FRIENDS OF ARAVA INSTITUTE$6,200
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$2,360
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF ARAVA INSTITUTE: $6k → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 17%PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART: $250 → 15%Center for the Blind: $300 → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $5k → 12%Junior League Las Vegas: $260 → 13%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $1k → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 17%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN CASA: $1k → 8%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $300 → 12%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $206 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $30k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $100 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15k → 17%JEWISH COLORADO: $200 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $14k → 17%METRO DENVER PARTNERS: $200 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13k → 17%MILE HIGH UNITED WAY: $25 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $12k → 17%ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $100 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10k → 17%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $300 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10k → 17%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $286 → 12%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1k → 17%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $260 → 12%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $260 → 12%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $260 → 12%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $260 → 12%JUNIOR LEAGUE: $108 → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $150 → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $150 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$114k · 4 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$114k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+236%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +80%
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANUEL
    5× · 2017–2024 · $7k
  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • DD
    DENVER DEBUTANTE BALLFINE ARTS FOUN
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN CASA
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CC
    COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLINDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $300 · revenue +636%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
2
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
3
Tucson Jewish Community Center Inc

The mission of the tucson jewish community center (tucson j) is to cultivate and enrich jewish identity, ensure jewish continuity, foster wellness, and broaden communal harmony. the vision is to strive to be an outstanding jewish community…

Human Services
4
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Denver Film Society

The mission of the denver film society is to develop opportunities for diverse audiences to discover film through creative, thought-provoking experiences. we strive to cultivate and celebrate film as an art form; to enrich and expand the…

Arts & Culture
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
9
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
10
Jewish Learning Venture

The mission of jewish learning venture is to inspire and empower those seeking to make jewish life, learning, and community relevant and meaningful, by providing 1)effective, cutting-edge, professional development and leadership training,…

Religion
11
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
12
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Center for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $105,400 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUETEMPLE EMANUEL — $6,723 · OtherTEMPLE EMA…JUNIOR LEAGUE — $1,734 · OtherJUNIOR LEA…DENVER DEBUTANTE BALLFINE ARTS FOUN — $1,500 · OtherDENVER DEB…ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN CASA — $1,300 · OtherADVOCATES …+4 more — $525 · OtherFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD — $6,200 · EnvironmentJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,360 · InternationalDENVER ART MUSEUM — $300 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $250 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $300 · HealthJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS — $260 · Community Improvement
Civil Rights$105,400Other$11,782Environment$6,200International$4,360Arts & Culture$550Health$300Community Improvement$260

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $105,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD — $6,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS — $260 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gsr Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph