Skip to content
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Encourage and promote philanthropy and charitable giving.

$3.1B
Granted FY2024still arriving
7,424
Grants FY2024still arriving
52
States reached
$274M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.1BEducation$3.5BHuman Services$1.1BHealth$791MReligion$759MEnvironment$639MArts & Culture$529MCommunity Improvement$447MOther$0
02FY2024 · 7424 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7,424 grants below total $2,957,478,954, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,082,130,420 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $124,651,466 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k664 grants · $4.6M
  • $10k–50k3928 grants · $76M
  • $50k–250k1778 grants · $178M
  • $250k+1054 grants · $2.7B
$25,000
Median grant
52
States reached
$12.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR$274,122,388
BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC$101,082,500
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$84,255,680
GIVEDIRECTLY INC$50,592,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$46,170,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS INC$46,073,350
UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION$42,500,000
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$39,929,000
RF CATALYTIC CAPITAL INC$35,000,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV$32,450,178
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION$31,810,700
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION$30,000,000
HOUSING TRUST SILICON VALLEY$30,000,000
HOMEWISE INC$25,000,000
CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION$25,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $901.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $4.0M → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4.5M → 9%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $4.0M → 12%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $4.0M → 12%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $7.0M → 11%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $4.0M → 12%PEOPLES FORUM INC: $12.0M → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $10.8M → 20%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $5.0M → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $8.1M → 20%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.4M → 17%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $5.0M → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $7.9M → 20%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.1M → 17%PEOPLES FORUM INC: $4.4M → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $5.6M → 20%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.1M → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $4.7M → 20%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.1M → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.0M → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $4.0M → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $4.0M → 17%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING CTY-SNOHOMISH C: $4.5M → 9%YAD ELIEZER USA INC: $12.5M → 20%YAD ELIEZER USA INC: $12.5M → 20%YAD ELIEZER USA INC: $11.5M → 20%TIDES CENTER: $5.4M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5.2M → 10%THE YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $8.7M → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $6.3M → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $6.0M → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $5.8M → 9%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $108.0M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $101.1M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $96.9M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $93.6M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $88.8M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $26.4M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $15.9M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $6.2M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $6.0M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $5.2M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $5.2M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $5.0M → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $5.0M → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $5.2M → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $5.0M → 17%ACCOMPANY CAPITAL INC: $5.0M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1B · 1610 repeat orgs$755M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

1610 repeat relationships: 1310 still active in FY2024, 300 since wound down; 163 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1610
122

Total granted

$8.1B
$231M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-6%

Still filing today

87%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $531M · revenue +677% · 51% of their budget
  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $273M · revenue +182% · 45% of their budget
  • XI
    XQ INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $249M · revenue +22% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • PA
    PALO ALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $22M
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $14M · revenue +11%
  • WC
    Wyoming Catholic Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10M · revenue +121%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—
2
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
3
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education
7
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
8
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
9
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Embolden creative leaders to transform society through equity, empathy, & imagination.

Education
10
Foreign Policy Research Institute

Highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on u.s. foreign policy

International
11
Fielding Graduate University

Fielding provides doctoral, master's and graduate-level certificate programs in the fields of educational leadership, organization development, and psychology.

—
12
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1790 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1790 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

342
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
230
Early backer (in before they grew)
1766/1790
Grantees still filing
1258/1790
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,691,862,653 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $825,827,230 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $177,209,232 · PhilanthropyStriveTogether Inc: $128,614,600 · Philanthropy+19 more: $633,207,449 · Philanthropy+19 moreUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $272,854,374 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUN…XQ INSTITUTE: $249,369,126 · EducationXQ INSTITUTETHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $201,643,292 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $90,408,500 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $89,555,600 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $86,999,785 · Education+53 more: $1,178,274,791 · Education+53 moreBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $530,747,000 · Human ServicesBLUE MERID…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $52,026,500 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $38,946,201 · Human ServicesYad Eliezer USA Inc: $37,224,747 · Human ServicesYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $34,000,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $32,637,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $30,717,125 · Human Services+8 more: $143,420,026 · Human Services+8 moreCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $260,533,240 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST …CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $163,000,000 · OtherCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $81,832,300 · OtherTHE JUSTICE AND EDUCATION FUND INC: $68,773,701 · Other+71 more: $1,477,436,599 · Other+71 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $429,697,688 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY: $51,246,114 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $22,629,950 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $21,344,500 · Community Improvement+7 more: $102,084,250 · Community ImprovementNIA TERO FOUNDATION: $75,061,800 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $42,429,500 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUND: $38,371,650 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $31,160,437 · EnvironmentTHE SUNRISE PROJECT INC: $20,000,000 · EnvironmentCLEARPATH INC: $18,801,732 · EnvironmentCLIMATE ARC INC: $13,300,000 · EnvironmentELEMENTAL EXCELERATOR INC: $12,461,050 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,601,950 · EnvironmentMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $112,875,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $49,520,666 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $23,739,400 · Arts & CultureEXCELLENCE INITIATIVE: $16,329,172 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $11,551,771 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $11,243,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $11,025,500 · Arts & CultureDESTINATION CRENSHAW: $11,000,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$3,456,721,164Education$2,169,105,468Human Services$899,718,599Other$2,051,575,840Community Improvement$627,002,502Environment$263,188,119Arts & Culture$247,284,509

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,691,862,653 over 8y, 12% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $825,827,230 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $530,747,000 over 7y, 51% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $429,697,688 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $272,854,374 over 8y, 45% of budgetXQ INSTITUTE: $249,369,126 over 5y, 100% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $201,643,292 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $177,209,232 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $163,000,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetStriveTogether Inc: $128,614,600 over 7y, 91% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $112,875,000 over 8y, 72% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $90,408,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $89,555,600 over 8y, 71% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $86,999,785 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $85,037,050 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetUNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION: $85,000,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $81,832,300 over 8y, 11% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $77,094,716 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNIA TERO FOUNDATION: $75,061,800 over 5y, 59% of budgetRF CATALYTIC CAPITAL INC: $70,000,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTHE JUSTICE AND EDUCATION FUND INC: $68,773,701 over 6y, 100% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $65,193,106 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetUpstream USA Inc: $65,001,000 over 7y, 40% of budgetChicago Cred Inc: $59,519,869 over 5y, 86% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $59,015,187 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $54,412,850 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC: $52,504,000 over 4y, 99% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $52,453,533 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $52,026,500 over 6y, 24% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $51,539,911 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $51,246,114 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetU OF O FOUNDATION SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION: $50,000,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49,549,300 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $49,520,666 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $42,652,050 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $42,429,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $42,072,400 over 6y, 43% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $41,499,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $38,946,201 over 8y, 19% of budgetSTART EARLY: $38,452,000 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetWINDWARD FUND: $38,371,650 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetYad Eliezer USA Inc: $37,224,747 over 4y, 97% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $35,356,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $35,297,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $34,000,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $33,968,764 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND: $33,000,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $32,637,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds XQ INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds StriveTogether Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NIA TERO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RF CATALYTIC CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JUSTICE AND EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Cred Inc ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds U OF O FOUNDATION SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Raven Trust FundThe Karsh Family Foun…Valhalla FoundationRobert and Dana Emery…Penner Family Foundat…John and Marcia Goldm…Give Forward Foundati…Grousemont FoundationThe Ohr Hakotel Found…Pritzker FoundationHarman Family Foundat…Gorder Family Foundat…
Raven Trust FundWA31.2× affinity28 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raven Trust Fund · The Karsh Family Foundation · Valhalla Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · Penner Family Foundation Inc · John and Marcia Goldman Foundation · Give Forward Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · Pritzker Foundation · Harman Family Foundation · Gorder Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Florida Community Loan Fund Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • The Achievement Network Ltd: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kipp Team and Family Schools Inc: 0% of income from government
  • 1st Street Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home