· Private foundation
Grunt Style Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IRREVERENT WARRIORS | $140,959 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans to provide motivation, camaraderie, and to offer a release to cope with similar difficulties in a positive and therapeutic way. Providing safe, fun, and…
Supports combat veterans in overcoming the challenges of post-military transition by reconnecting those who served together overseas through the execution of recovery reunions.
Assist in the healing and reintegration of our wounded heroes through support, outreach, assistance and recovery.
Warrior's hope seeks to engage military veterans and service members to assist them in experiencing peace for the soul, purpose of mind, and prosperity of spirit, resulting in renewed and invigorated lives.
The military creates a set of unique challenges that most people don't recognize. these invisible wounds often lead to isolation, addiction, and suicide. the warrior's journey is dedicated to raising awareness and creating preventative…
To identify needs of veterans of military service regardless of branch and provide resources to meet those needs by providing support directly to the veteran service members and/or their families in order that such service members can lead…
Us4Warriors helps warriors and their families, regardless of age or era, and not just a select group or specific condition. Us4Warriors helps them live for a stronger life, helps them prosper for a brighter future, and helps them reach a…
Transition for service members.
Provide honor and support, emotionally and financially to our veterans and their families through outdoor activities such as hunting and fishing, for their commitment and courage. Continued - Schedule O
Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.
To provide veterans therapeutic hunting, fishing and other outdoor trips to help combat veterans suicide and post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd).
To address the emotional and spiritual needs of veterans
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soldiers' Angels and the most unlike its peers is Hope for the Day. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IRREVERENT WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds GOLD STAR TEEN ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds BURN PITS 360 ↗
- Who funds SOLDIERS' ANGELS ↗
- Who funds CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds 360 VETERANS ↗
- Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
- Who funds HOPE RESTORED ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR THE DAY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grunt Style Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Grunt Style Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Grunt Style Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.