Skip to content

· Public charity

Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co

Go topeka creates county-wide economic success for all companies and citizens through implementation of an aggressive economic development strategy that capitalizes on the unique strengths of the community.

$488k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Community Improvement$3.3MArts & Culture$727kEducation$508kEmployment$498kRecreation & Sports$183kFood & Nutrition$73kPublic Benefit$53kHuman Services$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $322,346, the rows itemized in this filing. The $487,911 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $165,565 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$11,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
GREATER TOPEKA PARNERSHIP INC$54,627
ADVISORS EXCEL LLC$41,250
SEISMI INC$17,500
ARCH PET FOOD$15,000
COREFIRST BANK$12,500
RIGHT COAST HEMP LLC$11,650
STORMONT VAIL HEALTHCARE INC$11,250
REVELATIONS EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY INC OF SWF$11,244
KANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT$9,325
5 ELEMENTS FOOD THERAPY$8,000
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA$7,500
DISCOVERY FURNITURE INC$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM ST FRANCIS CAMPUS$7,500
ISOMARK$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF TOPEKA: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Colessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 22 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
131

Total granted

$1.5M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+7%

Still filing today

14%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $208k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K
    KTWU
    5× · 2018–2022 · $550k
  • GT
    GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $200k · revenue -55% · 52% of their budget
  • GT
    GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $167k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • DT
    DOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1.3M · revenue -46% · 72% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF TOPEKA
    one grant, 2019 · $870k
  • NT
    NORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $644k · revenue -77% · 46% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Topeka Chamber of Commerce

The greater topeka chamber of commerce mobilizes the community to speak with a highly influential voice in support of public policies that create economic success. through a robust advocacy program which includes extensive professional…

—
2
Topeka Civic Theatre and Academy Endowment Trust

To build & prudently manage the assets of our endowment, which will secure the joys of live theatre in our community.

Arts & Culture
3
Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co

Go topeka creates county-wide economic success for all companies and citizens through implementation of an aggressive economic development strategy that capitalizes on the unique strengths of the community.

Community Improvement
4
Downtown Topeka Inc

To ensure that topeka's downtown is the center of a thriving regional economy through recruiting, retaining and engaging commercial, cultural and residential opportunities. dti administers several programs on behalf of the city of topeka…

—
5
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
6
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
7
The Topeka Public Schools Foundation

To enhance educational opportunities for all students through a partnership of our community and its public schools.

—
8
Greater Kansas City Sports Foundation

Foster and support amateur sports competition

Recreation & Sports
9
El Dorado Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the el dorado chamber of commerce is to enhance and develop the economic vitality of business through leadership, education, advocacy, and relationship development.

—
10
Kansas National Education Association

To advocate for education professionals and to unite our members, kansans, and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

—
11
Greater Kansas City Sports Commission

Focus and organize community support for the sporting events the city enjoys and facilitate the acquisition of additional sporting events.

—
12
Visit Topeka Inc

Visit topeka increases tourism's economic impact on topeka through destination development and brand management. it is our job to promote the city of topeka. each year, thousands of visitors come to topeka to visit friends and family,…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Topeka Partnership Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Stormont-Vail Healthcare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION: $1,250,002 · OtherDOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATIONCITY OF TOPEKA: $870,104 · OtherCITY OF TOPEKAKTWU: $550,000 · OtherKTWUTOPEKA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $163,820 · OtherADVISORS EXCEL LLC: $161,250 · Other+150 more: $1,311,219 · Other+150 moreNORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC: $644,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TOPEKA A…HISTORIC JAYHAWK THEATRE INC: $53,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC JAYHA…+1 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP INC: $166,705 · Community ImprovementWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationKansas State High School Activities Association: $7,500 · EducationStormont-Vail Healthcare Inc: $18,750 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Human Services
Other$4,306,395Arts & Culture$704,500Community Improvement$366,705Education$107,500Health$18,750Human Services$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION: $1,250,002 over 1y, 72% of budgetNORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC: $644,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP INC: $166,705 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC JAYHAWK THEATRE INC: $53,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetStormont-Vail Healthcare Inc: $18,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKansas State High School Activities Association: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST KANSAS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC JAYHAWK THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Stormont-Vail Healthcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · Stormont-Vail Foundation · United Way of Kaw Valley Inc · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Growth Organization of Topekashawnee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph