Skip to content
Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi

Mission: we partner with members and the communities we serve to maximize health and well-being.

$359k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$1.6MEducation$727kPhilanthropy$205kHealth$194kYouth Development$106kEnvironment$45kArts & Culture$30kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $323,492, the rows itemized in this filing. The $358,968 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,476 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$151M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$200,000
FOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC$35,838
UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY$27,500
FOUNDATION FOR MADISON'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC$14,169
CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY$10,000
COMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN$10,000
CENTER FOR BLACK EXCELLENCE AND CULTURE INC$10,000
REACH OUT AND READ INC$8,485
DR RUSSELL HESS FUND$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $20k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $15k → 10%Centro Hispano of Dane County: $15k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 12 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$2.9M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+43%

Still filing today

92%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +70%
  • EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $600k · revenue +10%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $157k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • 1B
    100 BLACK MEN OF MADISON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +60%
  • HI
    HMONG INSTITUTE INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison Development Corporation

Madison development corporation (mdc)'s mission is to help create jobs by providing gap financing to small businesses and to develop and finance quality, affordable workforce housing units in madison and the dane county area.

Community Improvement
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
4
Madison Black Chamber of Commerce Inc

The madison black chamber of commerce (mbcc) empowers the greater madison community by growing and sustaining black owned businesses through education, advocacy and developing black wealth to promote the power and impact of black owned…

Community Improvement
5
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
6
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

—
7
Madison Teachers Inc

Madison teachers incorporated (mti) is a labor union representing teachers, substitute teachers, educational assistants, clerical/technical employees, and school security assistants who are employed by the madison metropolitan school…

—
8
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
Madison Community Hospital

Madison regional health system serves as a community health focal point through the provision of compassionate, quality, and innovative care.

Health
10
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
11
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
12
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Madison Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hmong Institute Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,600,000 · OtherACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $204,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC+7 more: $142,931 · Other+7 moreEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $600,000 · EducationEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INCMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $59,925 · EducationMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUN…+3 more: $42,338 · Education+3 moreFOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC: $157,056 · HealthCENTRO HISPANO INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT COUNCIL OF MADISON INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR BLACK EXCELLENCE AND CULTURE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureREAP FOOD GROUP INC: $12,500 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,947,431Education$702,263Health$157,056Human Services$95,000Arts & Culture$20,000Food & Nutrition$12,500Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $1,600,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $600,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $204,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC: $157,056 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $59,925 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES OF WISCONSIN INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EXCELLENCE AND CULTURE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER MADISON INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREAP FOOD GROUP INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF MADISON INC: $11,353 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF MADISON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $8,485 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community Fou…The Evjue Foundation …Madison Gas and Elect…Ascendium Education S…United Way of Dane Co…Alliant Energy Founda…Meriter Health Servic…Summit Credit UnionThe Oscar Rennebohm F…The Roots and Wings F…Green Bay Packers Fou…Ssm Health Care of Wi…
Madison Community FoundationWI32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Meriter Health Services Inc · Summit Credit Union · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ssm Health Care of Wisconsin Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home