Loading…
· Public charity
GREGG BUSSJAEGER MEMORIAL
The organization's purpose is to support organizations that serve the needs of youth in the community of glendale, ca, and its surrounding communities.
$104k
Granted FY2025
3
Grants
1
Communities
$87k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Education$187kHousing & Shelter$18kYouth Development$13kHuman Services$6kHealth$750Other$64k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
healthy
2019
—
2020
taking reins
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$551k
Total assets
Largest grants
- GLENDALE YMCA$86,701
- GLENDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
- ASCENCIA$6,891
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$283k · 5 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
5
Total granted
$283k
$6k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+55%
+149%
Still filing today
100%
60%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GYGLENDALE YMCA9× · 2017–2025 · $187k · revenue +13%
- AASCENCIA3× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +68%
- GYGLENDALE YOUTH ALLIANCE3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- HHUMAN-I-Tgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +1475%
- PFPAC FREMONTone grant, 2018 · $1k
- TTTAKING THE REINSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +149%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Gryd Foundation
The gryd foundation believes that every youth, regardless of race, gender, or geography, should have the resources, opportunities, and systems to grow up and to lead healthy, fulfilling lives. our mission is to create a safer, healthier…
Youth Development
2
Young Men's Christian Association
An organization committed to strengthen the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility.
Human Services
3
Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena
Ywca glendale and pasadena is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all. we provide resources and support to survivors of domestic violence and their children and through…
—
4
Young Men's Christian Association
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.
Human Services
5
Ywca Golden Gate Silicon Valley
To empower women, children, and their families, and to eliminate racism, hatred, and prejudice.
Human Services
6
Young Men's Christian Association
To put christian principles into practice through programs and activities that develop the spirit, mind and body of youth, adults and families in knoxville, tn and surrounding communities.
Human Services
7
Young Mens Christian Association
We are the program of choice for inspiring youth to reach their full potential.
Human Services
8
Youthbuild Usa Inc
To create a world where all young people are seen for their potentialwith love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild…
Employment
9
Ywca Gla Urban Campus Development Corp
To operate and support the ywca greater los angeles in building the urban campus project.
Youth Development
10
The Young Mens Christian Association of
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body.
—
11
Young Mens Christian Association of Greensburg
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.our areas of focus include youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility.we strive to develop youth through our…
Human Services
12
Young Mens Christian Association of
The ymca of geneva is a volunteer led public charity that includes men, women and children of all ages, sexual orientation, abilities, incomes, races and religions. the geneva family ymca is dedicated to putting christian values into…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Glendale and the most unlike its peers is Taking the Reins. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$187,197Other$63,880Housing & Shelter$18,391Youth Development$12,500Human Services$6,000Health$750
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation GREGG BUSSJAEGER MEMORIAL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GLENDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~12 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 953815676 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GLENDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Gregg Bussjaeger Memorial?
Find your warmest path to Gregg Bussjaeger Memorial through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines