Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Greenville Area Community Fnd

The mission of the Greenville Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the greater Greenville area.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.8MRecreation & Sports$1.7MHuman Services$828kPublic Benefit$449kHealth$365kReligion$317kArts & Culture$313kInternational$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $1,024,306 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,286,664 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,262,358 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $442k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $545k
$20,778
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids$225,000
Greenville Public Schools$176,413
City of Greenville$87,000
EightCAP Inc$56,498
Education Foundation of Greenville$42,375
Montcalm Area Reading Council$38,430
Belding Area Schools$36,344
St Charles Borromeo School$33,628
First Congregational Church of Greenville$33,533
United Way of Greater Central Michigan$30,359
Habitat for Humanity of Montcalm County$30,000
Corewell Health Foundation West Michigan$25,500
Special Olympics Michigan Inc$23,250
Greenville Optimist Club$22,603
Greenville Area Senior Center for Senior Citizens$20,778
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $709k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Camp Newaygo: $8k → 13%Camp Newaygo: $8k → 13%Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids: $225k → 11%Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids: $20k → 11%EIGHT CAP: $64k → 15%EIGHT CAP: $62k → 15%EightCAP Inc: $56k → 15%EightCAP Inc: $35k → 15%EIGHT CAP: $34k → 15%EIGHT CAP: $30k → 15%Greenville Area Senior Center for Senior Citizens: $26k → 15%CLAY STREET CENTER: $23k → 15%Greenville Area Senior Center for Senior Citizens: $21k → 15%GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER: $16k → 15%MOUNT CALVARY CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL: $15k → 15%CLAY STREET CENTER: $14k → 15%GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 15%For Goodness Sake: $11k → 15%ALPHA FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 15%For Goodness Sake: $9k → 15%GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 15%GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 39 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
18

Total granted

$7.3M
$272k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-4%

Still filing today

59%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTCALM COUNTY 4H FAIR ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +86%
  • EF
    EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $414k · revenue +10% · 89% of their budget
  • EI
    EIGHTCAP INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $296k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTCALM COUNTY 4-H FAIR ASSOCIATIO
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • GH
    GLC Hope Ministries
    one grant, 2018 · $38k · revenue -85%
  • FR
    FLAT RIVER ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
C O G I C Community Center

The COGIC Center has successfully provided 1000 meals per month for underprivileged youth ages 6-18 years of age. This is an after school program from the hours of 3;30p.m. - 7:30p.m. Additional the COGIC Center provides after school…

Human Services
2
Greater Missoula Family Ymca

The missoula family ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y serves families and individuals of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions.…

Human Services
3
Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity

The mission of Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity is to improve lives in our community by building safe and affordable housing in partnership with Gods people.

4
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services
5
Hope Gain Center of West Michigan

To promote the well-being and economic self sufficiency of individuals living with mental illness by providing job training, placement services, and other resources that enable them to gain employment in remote work settings. Through our…

Employment
6
Greater Marinette-Menominee Ymca Inc

Community programs and services for families, putting christian principles into practicing healthy living, youth development and social responsibility. the ymca's primary exempt purpose is to provide community-based programs that meet the…

Human Services
7
United Way of Midland County

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the Midland community through leadership, collaboration, volunteerism and charitable fundraising.

8
Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc

The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
9
The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines

The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…

10
Greater Green Bay Ymca Inc

The greater green bay ymca is a non-profit organization that puts christian principles into practice to strengthen the foundation of our community by building healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
11
Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc

The Y is the nation's leading nonprofit committed to strengthening communities through Youth Development, Healthy Living and Social Responsibility.

Human Services
12
Gleaners Community Food Bank of Southeastern Michigan

We exist to provide households with access to sufficient, nutritious food and related resources. we accomplish this through collaboration, efficient operations, education, and innovative solutions to achieve a hunger-free community in…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fremont Area Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Family Services of Greenville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGrand Rapids Community Deve…Faith-Based School SupportHealthcare Foundations & Se…Family & Food Support Servi…Arts & Cultural InstitutionsKent County Community Servi…Community Development & Rec…Supportive Housing Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr13%10%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr13%11%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr17%45%20–35yr15%7%35–55yr13%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/61
the rest of the field
10%
401/3,910

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
18/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,086,409 · OtherGREENVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLSCity of Greenville — $711,479 · OtherCity of GreenvilleBELDING AREA SCHOOLS — $256,432 · OtherBELDING AREA SCHOOLSSAINT CHARLES CHURCH — $222,118 · OtherCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MI — $194,723 · OtherUnited Way of Montcalm-Ionia Counties — $185,126 · OtherFLAT RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $173,457 · OtherCITY OF BELDING — $162,810 · OtherGREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $150,000 · Other+33 more — $1,336,963 · Other+33 moreMONTCALM COUNTY 4H FAIR ASSOCIATION — $1,281,173 · Recreation & SportsMONTCALM COUNTY 4H FA…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $80,700 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICH…KELSEY COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER FOUNDATION — $74,011 · Recreation & SportsEIGHTCAP INC — $296,195 · Human ServicesEIGHTCAP I…The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) — $245,000 · Human ServicesThe Young …THE GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS — $86,198 · Human ServicesTHE GREENV…CLAY STREET CENTER — $36,972 · Human Services+3 more — $45,000 · Human Services+3 moreEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE — $414,140 · PhilanthropyFremont Area Community Foundation — $22,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES INC — $225,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 · InternationalMONTCALM AREA READING COUNCIL — $202,610 · Education2ND CHANCE CORPORATION — $22,829 · EducationRANDY'S HOUSE — $116,112 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOPE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $23,000 · HealthMontcalm Prevention Collaborative — $19,500 · Health
Other$4,479,517Recreation & Sports$1,435,884Human Services$709,365Philanthropy$446,140International$255,000Education$225,439Health$158,612

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTCALM COUNTY 4H FAIR ASSOCIATION — $1,281,173 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE — $414,140 over 8y, 89% of budgetEIGHTCAP INC — $296,195 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) — $245,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES INC — $225,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetMONTCALM AREA READING COUNCIL — $202,610 over 8y, 55% of budgetUnited Way of Montcalm-Ionia Counties — $185,126 over 7y, 29% of budgetRANDY'S HOUSE — $116,112 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetHave Mercy — $87,938 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS — $86,198 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $80,700 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRED MEIJER HEARTLAND TRAIL GROUP — $77,083 over 7y, 13% of budgetKELSEY COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER FOUNDATION — $74,011 over 3y, 28% of budgetGLC Hope Ministries — $38,049 over 1y, 14% of budgetCLAY STREET CENTER — $36,972 over 2y, 27% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $30,359 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIONIA MONTCALM SECURE & FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $25,733 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOPE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $23,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budget2ND CHANCE CORPORATION — $22,829 over 4y, 16% of budgetFremont Area Community Foundation — $22,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOR GOODNESS SAKE — $20,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetMontcalm Prevention Collaborative — $19,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetFAITH COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $15,432 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTRUENORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlpha Family Services of Greenville — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANISH FESTIVAL INC — $6,056 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTCALM COUNTY 4H FAIR ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE
  • Who funds EIGHTCAP INC
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES INC
  • Who funds MONTCALM AREA READING COUNCIL
  • Who funds United Way of Montcalm-Ionia Counties
  • Who funds GREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds RANDY'S HOUSE
  • Who funds Have Mercy
  • Who funds THE GREENVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FRED MEIJER HEARTLAND TRAIL GROUP
  • Who funds KELSEY COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONTCALM ALANO CLUB INC
  • Who funds GLC Hope Ministries
  • Who funds CLAY STREET CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICHIGAN
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds IONIA MONTCALM SECURE & FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds 2ND CHANCE CORPORATION
  • Who funds Fremont Area Community Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI24.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · United Way of Montcalm-Ionia Counties · Consumers Energy Foundation · Michigan College Access Network · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · Central Montcalm Community Foundation · Corewell Health Group Return · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Frey Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greenville Area Community Fnd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greenville Area Community Fnd?

    Find your warmest path to Greenville Area Community Fnd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph