Skip to content

· Private foundation

Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$433kCommunity Improvement$145kEnvironment$125kEducation$76kInternational$73kAnimals$38kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD BRIDGE FOUNDATION$20,000
NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION INTERSTATE COUNCIL$15,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CISA$10,000
CITYSPROUTS$7,000
NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT: $5k → 11%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT: $5k → 11%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 22 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$1.0M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+38%

Still filing today

64%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $100k · revenue +44%
  • RE
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +150%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FARMS OUTREACH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • AJ
    Agricultural Justice Project
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -100%
  • TD
    THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • TF
    THE FARMING SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
2
Berkshire Grown Inc

Through events, workshops, promotions, advocacy and education highlighting locally-grown and produced food, the organization helps to create a thriving local food economy.

Food & Nutrition
3
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
4
Organic Growers Research and Information Sharing N

To facilitate the developement of sustainable food systems by helping groweres to increase their knowledge of agro-ecosystems management and utilization of local and regional marketing strategies.

Food & Nutrition
5
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey Inc

NOFA-NJ is an Association of consumers, farmers and gardeners, creating a regionally based organic agricultural system which is economically viable. The corporation's goals are the following:- Increase the number of certified organic farms…

—
6
World Farmers Inc

To provide small farmers (immigrants, refugees and socially disadvantaged farmers) with mentoring, training, hands-on assistance in crop productions and marketing to build their capacity necessary to operate their own sustainable farming…

Food & Nutrition
7
Just Roots Inc

Create equitable access to healthy, local food in western Massachusetts

Food & Nutrition
8
Massachusetts Avenue Project Inc

The mission of Massachusetts Avenue Project is to nurture the growth of a diverse and equitable community food system and promote local economic opportunities, access to affordable, nutritious food and social-change education.

Human Services
9
Regenerative Roots Association

The mission of the Regenerative Roots Association is to strengthen the food and alternative energy systems in New England through the development of community farms, food forests, a food pantry, educational orchards, and farm to school…

Human Services
10
The Federation of Massachusetts Farmers and Gardeners Markets Inc

Mass farmers markets partners wtih farmers, consumers, and communities to improve the health of individuals, strenghten community vitality, and enhance local farm viability through farmers markets.

Food & Nutrition
11
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
12
New Britain Roots Inc

ROOTS is a community-engaged 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to promoting food security and agricultural education in K-12 programs. We make healthy food accessible and affordable to low-income families. We work with Connecticut farmers,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Growing Places Garden Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ocean River Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION INTERSTATE COUNCIL: $130,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION INTERST…CISA: $90,000 · OtherCISAIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGAINING GROUND INC: $56,000 · OtherGAINING GROUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+13 more: $82,250 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY FARMS OUTREACH INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FARMS OUTRE…NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I: $55,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST ORGANIC FAR…NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION MA CHAPTER INC: $36,500 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST ORGANIC FAR…Agricultural Justice Project: $15,000 · Food & NutritionAgricultural Justice …THE CHARITY GUILD INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHARITY GUILD INCThe Food Project Inc: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $10,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentREGIONAL ENVIRONM…CITYSPROUTS INC: $56,000 · EnvironmentCITYSPROUTS INCTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT…KROKA EXPEDITIONS INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentKROKA EXPEDITIONS…SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRO…+2 more: $7,500 · EnvironmentTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR N…BOSTON FARMS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementBOSTON FARMS C…THE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE URBAN FARM…PHILMONT BEAUTIFICATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementWORLD BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $73,440 · EducationNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $37,500 · AnimalsHULL LIFESAVING MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$463,250Food & Nutrition$221,500Environment$173,500Community Improvement$145,000Education$73,440Animals$37,500Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FARMS OUTREACH INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $73,440 over 3y, 34% of budgetCITYSPROUTS INC: $56,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetGAINING GROUND INC: $56,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I: $55,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $37,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION MA CHAPTER INC: $36,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBOSTON FARMS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $30,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetHULL LIFESAVING MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetGROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAgricultural Justice Project: $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE CHARITY GUILD INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Rising: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKROKA EXPEDITIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Farm School Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Food Project Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHILMONT BEAUTIFICATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBACKYARD GROWERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREENAGERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOcean River Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FARMS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITYSPROUTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NY I ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION MA CHAPTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON FARMS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HULL LIFESAVING MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Agricultural Justice Project ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARITY GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Girl Rising ↗
  • Who funds KROKA EXPEDITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC ↗
  • Who funds The Farm School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILMONT BEAUTIFICATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKYARD GROWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENAGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Spikenard Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ocean River Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amelia Peabody FoundationMA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amelia Peabody Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Clif Family Foundation · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Three Squares New England Inc · The Frederick E Weber Charities Corp · Reliant Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Growing Places Garden Project Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Community Farms Outreach Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Hull Lifesaving Museum Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The Farm School Inc: 12% of income from government
  • The Charity Guild Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Citysprouts Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Regional Environmental Council Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Gaining Ground Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees?

Find your warmest path to Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Green Leaf Foundation Nushin Kormi Et Al Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph