Skip to content

· Private foundation

Green Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$702k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$1.2MRecreation & Sports$455kFood & Nutrition$420kEducation$400kArts & Culture$357kHealth$207kInternational$118kPublic Benefit$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $355k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $265k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kinship$75,000
Good Power Education Fund$75,000
University Maryland College Park Fn$65,000
University Maryland Baltimore Fnd$50,000
Columbia University$40,000
Public Media Fund$40,000
Drylands Agroecology Research$35,000
Community Food Share$30,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$30,000
Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mtns$25,000
Democracy Forward$20,000
Center for Respon and Ethics Wash$20,000
Grand Canyon Trust$20,000
Colorado Plateau Foundation$15,000
Olney Theatre$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%Earth Force: $5k → 12%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%dZi Foundation: $5k → 7%dZi Foundation: $3k → 7%Womens Foundation of Colorado: $5k → 12%There with Care: $10k → 12%There with Care: $10k → 12%There with Care: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
WV
MD
AZ
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 39 repeat orgs$531k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
11

Total granted

$3.0M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

64%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $330k · revenue +525%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $165k · revenue +18%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $150k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • GG
    Getches Green Law Clinic
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SM
    Slow Money Institute Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -67%
  • UO
    Unitverity of Maryland Baltimore Fnd Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
4
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
5
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
Friends of the Earth (Action) Inc

To improve the environment through education and policy work, with an emphasis on pollution, climate change, and energy issues; and how congress and the administration stand on these issues.

—
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodpower Education Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Second State Press. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
28/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Maryland College Park Fnd: $390,000 · OtherUniversity of Maryland College Park FndUniversity of Maryland Baltimore Fnd Inc: $250,000 · OtherUniversity of Maryland Baltimore Fnd IncGrand Canyon Trust: $150,000 · OtherGrand Canyon TrustThe Biodiversity Narrative Project: $105,000 · OtherThe Biodiversity Narrative ProjectIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherCouncil for New Energy Economy: $90,000 · OtherGlobal Biodiversity Narrative Project: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · Other+31 more: $743,000 · Other+31 moreGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC: $330,000 · EnvironmentGOODPOWER EDUCA…THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $72,500 · EnvironmentTHORNE ECOLOGIC…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOU…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $35,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRA…COLORADO OPEN LANDS: $17,500 · Environment+3 more: $10,500 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $165,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOO…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $140,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …MAD AGRICULTURE: $100,000 · Food & NutritionMAD AGRICULTU…+2 more: $15,000 · Food & NutritionKINSHIP: $115,000 · Arts & CultureKINSHIPTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WASHI…OLNEY THEATRE CORPORATION INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureOLNEY THE…Second State Press: $36,000 · Arts & CultureSecond St…First Light Foundation: $35,000 · Arts & CultureFirst Lig…PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $17,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BR…WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $150,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $20,000 · HealthCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $27,500 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $10,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 · InternationalTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $22,500 · InternationalHAITI PROJECTS INC: $15,000 · InternationalURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $10,000 · International
Other$1,968,000Environment$510,500Food & Nutrition$420,000Arts & Culture$318,500Health$170,000Education$137,500International$117,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC: $330,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $165,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $150,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $140,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKINSHIP: $115,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE: $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $72,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSlow Money Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates: $47,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOLNEY THEATRE CORPORATION INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSecond State Press: $36,000 over 7y, 10.0% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Light Foundation: $35,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE: $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetE TOWN: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAITI PROJECTS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIM ROBARDS DANCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHSHARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Force Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetECOFLIGHT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MAD AGRICULTURE ↗
  • Who funds THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON BALLET ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Slow Money Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLNEY THEATRE CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Second State Press ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds First Light Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO25.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Patagoniaorg · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Olney Theatre Corporation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Green Fund?

Find your warmest path to Green Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Green’s filings →

More from the funding graph