Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Topeka Partnership Inc

To be the catalyst for economic prosperity within our community.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$556k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$3.7MHuman Services$2.5M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $504k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.4M
$315,632
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATTERSON FAMILY INFANT AND TODDLER CENTER LLC$556,197
THE LEARNING CENTER$536,491
GREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$329,719
SENT INC$315,987
T-ROCKS CHILD CARE CENTER$315,632
DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC$311,667
SUSANNA WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC$219,148
GROWTH ORGANIZATION OF TOPEKASHAWNEE CO$164,903
BUILDING BLOCKS OF TOPEKA INC$120,067
CALVARY LUTHERAN LEARNING CENTER$16,780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUILDING BLOCKS OF TOPEKA INC: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 6 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$5.1M
$271k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+9%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $892k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +61% · 55% of their budget
  • GT
    GREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +103% · 75% of their budget
  • SI
    SENT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $371k · revenue +89% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • GT
    GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $241k · revenue -64%
  • CU
    COUNTRYSIDE UNITED METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • VT
    VISIT TOPEKA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Topeka Partnership Inc

To be the catalyst for economic prosperity within our community.

Community Improvement
2
South Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

To promote area commerce

—
3
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
4
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
5
Downtown Topeka Foundation

To raise and expend funds for the purposes of preserving, restoring, and improving buildings, land, streets, parks, monuments and other historical and cultural aspects of the downtown area of topeka, kansas.

—
6
Greater Wichita Partnership Inc

Align resources and focus the community on common strategies that fast-forward economic growth in wichita and throughout south-central kansas. our work encompasses everything from creating a vibrant urban environment in downtown wichita to…

Community Improvement
7
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
8
Pittsburg Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote the Pittsburg, Kansas business community.

—
9
Topeka Collegiate School Inc

To prepare students for advanced education, successful careers and responsible citizenship through academic excellence and humanitarian ideals.

Education
10
Wichita County Economic Development

To improve the quality of life for residents of wichita county, ks through community and economic development activities.

Community Improvement
11
Northland Regional Chamber of Commerce

The northland regional chamber of commerce promotes growth and development in the kansas city, missouri northland area by monitoring important issues,educating members, assisting support activities, and providing a unified voice for…

—
12
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Growth Organization of Topekashawnee Co; the most unlike its peers is Countryside United Methodist Preschool Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC: $1,174,856 · OtherDOWNTOWN TOPEKA INCGREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,086,193 · OtherGREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEPATTERSON FAMILY INFANT AND TODDLER CENTER LLC: $843,185 · OtherPATTERSON FAMILY INFANT AND TODDLER CENTER LLCTHE LEARNING CENTER: $536,491 · OtherTHE LEARNING CENTERT-ROCKS CHILD CARE CENTER: $423,353 · OtherT-ROCKS CHILD CARE CENTERSUSANNA WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC: $219,148 · Other+2 more: $32,225 · OtherGROWTH ORGANIZATION OF TOPEKASHAWNEE CO: $1,207,375 · Community ImprovementGROWTH ORGANIZATION OF TOPEKASHAW…SENT INC: $370,657 · Community ImprovementSENT INCGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $240,826 · Community ImprovementGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDA…+1 more: $15,130 · Community ImprovementBUILDING BLOCKS OF TOPEKA INC: $120,067 · Human Services
Other$4,315,451Community Improvement$1,833,988Human Services$120,067

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROWTH ORGANIZATION OF TOPEKASHAWNEE CO: $1,207,375 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetDOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC: $1,174,856 over 5y, 55% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,086,193 over 5y, 75% of budgetSENT INC: $370,657 over 2y, 35% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $240,826 over 1y, 23% of budgetBUILDING BLOCKS OF TOPEKA INC: $120,067 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCOUNTRYSIDE UNITED METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC: $15,445 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVISIT TOPEKA INC: $15,130 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROWTH ORGANIZATION OF TOPEKASHAWNEE CO ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds SENT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BLOCKS OF TOPEKA INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNTRYSIDE UNITED METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIT TOPEKA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral AgenciesKS17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Topeka Partnership Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Topeka Partnership Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Topeka Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph