Skip to content
Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc

Behavioral health administrative services for oregon health plan members in twelve oregon counties.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$5.4MHousing & Shelter$291kHuman Services$120kEducation$23k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $201,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,362,353 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,161,353 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW DIRECTIONS NW$55,000
LATINX RECOVERY CENTER$30,000
COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS$30,000
WALLOWA VALLEY CENTER FOR WELLNESS$25,000
NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES$25,000
EASTERN OREGON HEALTH & WELLNESS$25,000
LIFEWAYS INC$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $258k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $711k → 15%TILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $27k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $36k → 15%EASTERN OREGON CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $75k → 20%PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $90k → 12%PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 13 repeat orgs$994k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$4.9M
$939k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+65%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $747k · revenue +85%
  • LI
    LIFEWAYS INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $632k · revenue +48%
  • ND
    NEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $515k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • CB
    CLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCAREgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $223k · revenue +196%
  • CC
    Columbia Community Mental Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $188k · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $171k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Options for Southern Oregon

Programs for people of all ages who have mental health needs. Our holistic approach addresses housing, advocacy, community integration, crisis intervention, therapy, co-occuring issues, education, work & economic well-being

Health
2
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
3
Eastern Oregon Alcoholism Foundation Inc

Eastern oregon alcoholism foundation provides treatment and educational services for individuals who have abused alcohol and drugs. program services include: duii/mip evaluations, residential treatment, parents program, detoxification,…

Health
4
Adapt

Provide our communities open access to world class primary care, addictions treatment, and behavior health care to promote health and restore lives, without regard for the ability to pay.

—
5
Cascadia Health

Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.

Health
6
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
7
Phoenix Counseling Center Inc

Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.

Health
8
Bestcare Treatment Services Inc

To advocate and provide compassionate care in the treatment and prevention of addiction, mental illness, and developmental disabilities.

Health
9
Community Wellness Collective

Mental health, drug abuse support. Operating a day-shelter and inclement weather shelter serving unhoused individuals in Newberg.

Health
10
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
11
Open Hearts Family Wellness

Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.

Human Services
12
Sequoia Mental Health Services Inc

We believe people with mental disabilities can live independently in the community. we provide services to achieve that life.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare; the most unlike its peers is Pioneer Relief Nursery Pioneer Relief Nursery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMATILLA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $1,173,807 · OtherUMATILLA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICESCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS: $591,302 · OtherCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONSIndividual grant recipient: $171,343 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $98,722 · Other+6 more: $201,076 · Other+6 moreLIFEWAYS INC: $631,828 · HealthLIFEWAYS INCNEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INC: $515,129 · HealthNEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INCWallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: $242,627 · HealthWallowa Valley Center for Wellness IncCLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $223,104 · HealthCLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCAREColumbia Community Mental Health Inc: $188,117 · HealthColumbia Community Mental Health IncSymmetry Care Inc: $116,579 · HealthSymmetry Care Inc+4 more: $146,872 · Health+4 moreCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $747,393 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELO…TILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $284,564 · Human ServicesTILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSE…PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $120,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER RELIEF NURSERY …EASTERN OREGON CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $75,000 · Human ServicesEASTERN OREGON CENTER F…OREGON FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $283,015 · EducationNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterOREGON WASHINGTON HEALTH NETWORK: $24,196 · Philanthropy
Other$2,236,250Health$2,064,256Human Services$1,226,957Education$283,015Housing & Shelter$25,000Philanthropy$24,196

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $747,393 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetLIFEWAYS INC: $631,828 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INC: $515,129 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $284,564 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetOREGON FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $283,015 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetWallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: $242,627 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $223,104 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetColumbia Community Mental Health Inc: $188,117 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY: $120,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetSymmetry Care Inc: $116,579 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEASTERN OREGON CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEASTERN OREGON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $49,400 over 2y, 45% of budgetST ANTHONY HOSPITAL: $34,139 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN OREGON HEALTHY LIVING ALLIANCE: $33,333 over 1y, 14% of budgetNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON WASHINGTON HEALTH NETWORK: $24,196 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Ford Family Found…The Roundhouse Founda…Careoregon IncThe Collins FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Eastern Oregon Center for Independent Living: 87% of income from government
  • Pioneer Relief Nursery Pioneer Relief Nursery: 58% of income from government
  • Oregon Family Support Network Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Symmetry Care Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Lifeways Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare: 20% of income from government
  • Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Center for Human Development Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Tillamook Family Counseling Center: 11% of income from government
  • Columbia Community Mental Health Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greater Oregon Behavioral Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home