· Public charity
Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc
Behavioral health administrative services for oregon health plan members in twelve oregon counties.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $201,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,362,353 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,161,353 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW DIRECTIONS NW | $55,000 |
| LATINX RECOVERY CENTER | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS | $30,000 |
| WALLOWA VALLEY CENTER FOR WELLNESS | $25,000 |
| NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES | $25,000 |
| EASTERN OREGON HEALTH & WELLNESS | $25,000 |
| LIFEWAYS INC | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC2× · 2018–2019 · $747k · revenue +85%
- LILIFEWAYS INC2× · 2018–2024 · $632k · revenue +48%
- NDNEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INC5× · 2018–2024 · $515k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- CBCLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCAREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $223k · revenue +196%
- CCColumbia Community Mental Health Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $188k · revenue +65%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $171k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Programs for people of all ages who have mental health needs. Our holistic approach addresses housing, advocacy, community integration, crisis intervention, therapy, co-occuring issues, education, work & economic well-being
We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.
Eastern oregon alcoholism foundation provides treatment and educational services for individuals who have abused alcohol and drugs. program services include: duii/mip evaluations, residential treatment, parents program, detoxification,…
Provide our communities open access to world class primary care, addictions treatment, and behavior health care to promote health and restore lives, without regard for the ability to pay.
Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.
To advocate and provide compassionate care in the treatment and prevention of addiction, mental illness, and developmental disabilities.
Mental health, drug abuse support. Operating a day-shelter and inclement weather shelter serving unhoused individuals in Newberg.
Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.
Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.
We believe people with mental disabilities can live independently in the community. we provide services to achieve that life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Pioneer Relief Nursery Pioneer Relief Nursery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS NORTHWEST INC ↗
- Who funds TILLAMOOK FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds OREGON FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc ↗
- Who funds CLATSOP BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds Columbia Community Mental Health Inc ↗
- Who funds PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY PIONEER RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Symmetry Care Inc ↗
- Who funds EASTERN OREGON CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds EASTERN OREGON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds EASTERN OREGON HEALTHY LIVING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LATINX RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds OREGON WASHINGTON HEALTH NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Eastern Oregon Center for Independent Living — 87% of income from government
- Pioneer Relief Nursery Pioneer Relief Nursery — 58% of income from government
- Oregon Family Support Network Inc — 55% of income from government
- Symmetry Care Inc — 25% of income from government
- Lifeways Inc — 24% of income from government
- Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare — 20% of income from government
- Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc — 20% of income from government
- Center for Human Development Inc — 16% of income from government
- Tillamook Family Counseling Center — 11% of income from government
- Columbia Community Mental Health Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.