· Community foundation
Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation
To receive charitable contributions from the public, administering, and investing those gift resources, and distributing the expendable portions of the resources and their earnings for the benefit of charitable recipients in the local area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 110 grants below total $2,174,689 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,489,799 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $315,110 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k50 grants · $368k
- $10k–50k56 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $281k
- $250k+1 grant · $339k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELIZABETH'S EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $339,491 |
| ALTAVISTA AREA YMCA | $117,600 |
| MIRIAM'S HOUSE | $110,719 |
| LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC | $52,349 |
| LYNCHBURG SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $47,146 |
| NEW VISTAS SCHOOL | $42,379 |
| LYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE | $41,158 |
| JUBILEE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $35,956 |
| LYNCHBURG GROWS | $35,293 |
| LYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY | $34,460 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC | $34,332 |
| OPERA ON THE JAMES | $33,517 |
| THE ARC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA | $32,608 |
| LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $30,812 |
| CAMP KUM-BA-YAH NATURE CENTER | $30,747 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
136 repeat relationships — 95 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EEELIZABETH'S EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +75%
- MHMIRIAM'S HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $855k · revenue +345%
- FCFREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $326k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- SPST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $41k
- TUTHE UP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue -46%
- CCCampbell County Training School Complexone grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue -88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.
The virginia association of museums is a statewide network serving the museum community. the association's mission statement is "the virginia association of museums helps our museum community succeed".
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
Virginia Voice is a non-profit audio reading and information service for individuals who are unable to read for themselves because of blindness, low vision, or other disabilities.
Furtherance of economic growth, education, training and development
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
The virginia discovery museum's mission is to operate a hands-on museum focusing on artistic, recreational, scientific, and educational programs and exhibits for the benefit of children who reside in the city of charlottesville and…
VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.
Little hands virginia's mission is to ensure young children in need in central virginia have essentials from day one to improve outcomes for life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lynchburg Community Action Group I Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Take My Hand Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
157 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 157 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ELIZABETH'S EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG GROWS ↗
- Who funds New Vistas School of Central Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc ↗
- Who funds Altavista Area YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA ON THE JAMES ↗
- Who funds Lynchburg Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Legacy Project Inc ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
- Who funds SAARA OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds BROOK HILL RETIREMENT CENTER FOR HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds AMAZEMENT SQUARE ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds JAMES RIVER DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Al Stroobants Foundation · Centra Health Inc · Foster Foundation · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · Schewel Charitable Foundation · M4k Lynchburg Inc · United Way of Central Virginia Inc · Bedford Community Health Foundation · Centra Health Foundation · Carrington Family Foundation · The Minnie and Bernard Lane Foundation · The Imperial Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.