· Public charity
Centra Health Foundation
To provide support to the centra healthcare system.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $6,136,739 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,335,645 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $198,906 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
- $250k+1 grant · $6.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRA HEALTH INC | $6,042,874 |
| BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $67,447 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC | $26,418 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of Centra Health Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCENTRA HEALTH INC7× · 2018–2024 · $31M · revenue +20%
- CACOMMUNITY ACCESS NETWORK INC2× · 2018–2019 · $1.1M · revenue +193%
- BMBEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL6× · 2018–2024 · $415k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- FCFREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INCone grant, 2018 · $80k · revenue +8%
- JHJOHNSON HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +74%
- AEAMELIA EMERGENCY SQUAD INCone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.
Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.
The purpose of the Community Health Center of the New River Valley (CHCNRV) is to provide affordable and high quality medical, dental, behavioral, and preventive health care services to people of all ages and circumstances, regardless of…
To improve health and advance health equity in alexandria, arlington, and fairfax by providing high quality primary care regardless of ability to pay.
The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.
Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.
To provide primary care services at no cost to uninsured and underinsured low income residents of west virginia.
To positively impact individual and community health.
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Virginia Health Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Neighbors Helping Neighbors of Amherst County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRA HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG GROWS ↗
- Who funds FREE FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT & ENDOWMENT ↗
- Who funds Heart of Virginia Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMELIA EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds ROADS TO RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DANVILLE PITTSYLVANIA CANCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP I GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT SENIOR RESOURCES AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds BROOK HILL RETIREMENT CENTER FOR HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds Coalition for HIV Awareness and Prevention Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RUSH HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds LYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC ↗
- Who funds RX DRUG ACCESS PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Girls on the Run Central Virginia and Blue Ridge ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS OF AMHERST COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc ↗
- Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' HAVEN A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND HILL HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMM SVCS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centra Health Inc · Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · The Al Stroobants Foundation · Foster Foundation · Schewel Charitable Foundation · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · The Harry D Forsyth Foundation · Carrington Family Foundation · M4k Lynchburg Inc · Valentine Family Foundation · United Way of Central Virginia Inc · Kva Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Centra Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.