Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Ennis United Way

To improve the quality of life of all people by responding to priority health and human service needs through gathering and distributing community resources in an efficient and accountable manner.

$238k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$824kHuman Services$452kHousing & Shelter$317kCrime & Legal$205kInternational$150kEducation$112kFood & Nutrition$51kAnimals$28k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $229,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $238,220 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,220 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$331k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNIS$115,000
ENNIS GOLDEN CIRCLE SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$40,000
HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS$30,000
A-CROSS$21,000
ELLIS COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$15,000
GIVE-A-KID-A-CHANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $352k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON & ELLIS: $13k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON & ELLIS: $10k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON & ELLIS: $10k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON & ELLIS: $10k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON & ELLIS: $8k → 9%HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS: $64k → 9%HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS: $62k → 9%HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS: $62k → 9%HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS: $62k → 9%HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS: $51k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 9 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$7k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterInternationalCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $824k · revenue +30%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $392k · revenue +237%
  • AC
    A Christian Response of Shelter And Service
    9× · 2017–2025 · $317k · revenue +64% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ENNIS PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ennis Senior Center Inc

Our goal is to provide a comfortable place for seniors to congregate to have a meal, participate in card games, board games, watch TV, or simply sit and chat or read. Additional activities will be offered such as lunch and a movie or…

Human Services
2
North East Texas Benevolence Inc

Provide basic food essentials to individuals and families in need in local community through voluntary contributions from individuals and organiztions.

Food & Nutrition
3
Helping Hands for the Elderly

Meals for the elderly of crockett county, texas

Food & Nutrition
4
Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

—
5
Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—
6
East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition

End homelessness in East Texas, & Community Collaboration

Human Services
7
Glenn County Senior Centers

Provide Senior Citizens daily activity programs and nutrition. A thrift shop is operated to partially support the activities.

—
8
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
9
Gonzales County Senior Citizens Association Inc

Provide home delivered meals and transportation services free of charge

Food & Nutrition
10
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
11
Veterans Center of North Texas Inc

To assist Veterans of all ages & service era & their families navigate through the network of public & private agencies to obtain assistance service & support to establish & maintain productive lifestyles within the North Texas communities.

Health
12
Cross Timbers Senior Citizens Support Task Force

Provide activities, essential services and assistance for 30 to 40 senior citizens 5 days a week 5 days a week. this includes: meals and social activities, such as dancing, bingo, movies.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals on Wheels North Central Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Christian Response of Shelter and Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNIS: $824,359 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNISHELPING HANDS OF ENNIS INC: $392,200 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF ENNIS …MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $50,956 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH C…A Christian Response of Shelter And Service: $316,984 · Housing & ShelterA Christian Resp…GOLDEN CIRCLE ACTIVITIES CENTER INC: $210,099 · InternationalGOLDEN CIRC…ELLIS COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $204,914 · Crime & LegalELLIS COUN…GIVE-A-KID-A-CHANCE: $79,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ENNIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6,700 · OtherRUNNIN FREE RANCH: $27,896 · HealthMISSION ENNIS BRIDGE BUILDERS: $26,000 · Public Benefit
Youth Development$824,359Human Services$443,156Housing & Shelter$316,984International$210,099Crime & Legal$204,914Other$85,700Health$27,896Public Benefit$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNIS: $824,359 over 9y, 20% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF ENNIS INC: $392,200 over 8y, 13% of budgetA Christian Response of Shelter And Service: $316,984 over 9y, 26% of budgetGOLDEN CIRCLE ACTIVITIES CENTER INC: $210,099 over 9y, 43% of budgetELLIS COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $204,914 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $50,956 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetRUNNIN FREE RANCH: $27,896 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetMISSION ENNIS BRIDGE BUILDERS: $26,000 over 3y, 37% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ENNIS ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF ENNIS INC ↗
  • Who funds A Christian Response of Shelter And Service ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN CIRCLE ACTIVITIES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ELLIS COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RUNNIN FREE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ENNIS BRIDGE BUILDERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Ennis United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Ennis United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Ennis United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph