Skip to content

· Public charity

Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health

Advancing excellence in tribal health through culturally guided service, innovation, and advocacy.

$772k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$156k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.1MCivil Rights$772kHuman Services$417kPhilanthropy$351kEducation$331kArts & Culture$323kScience & Tech$218kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $687k
$96,104
Median grant
3
States reached
$265M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE$156,226
WINNEBAGO COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE$115,500
THE KEYA FOUNDATION$114,809
SPIRIT LAKE TRIBE$103,920
SANTEE HEALTH AND WELLNESS$100,000
SINTE GLESKA UNIVERISTY$96,104
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE$25,800
PONCA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA$19,986
TRIBAL HEALTH ADMIN-RST$10,000
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA$10,000
WINNEBAGO PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT$10,000
SANTEE SIOUX NATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TRENTON INDIAN SERVICE AREA: $26k → 8%WILD HORSE BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPM: $32k → 31%DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $28k → 40%TRENTON INDIAN SERVICE AREA: $11k → 8%DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $24k → 40%TRENTON INDIAN SERVICE AREA: $8k → 8%INDIAN CENTER: $30k → 13%TRENTON INDIAN SERVICE AREA: $8k → 8%INDIAN CENTER: $20k → 13%WHERE ALL WOMEN ARE HONORED: $32k → 42%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 42 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
28

Total granted

$7.3M
$975k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+37%

Still filing today

19%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropySocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    OYATE TECA PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $401k · revenue +640% · 28% of their budget
  • DW
    DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +323%
  • KW
    KUL WICASA WOPASI
    2× · 2018–2019 · $31k · revenue +229%

Funded once

  • WT
    WINNEBAGO TRIBE OF NEBRASKA - PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $90k
  • SH
    SANTEE HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • SW
    SISSETON WAHPETON OYATE
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
2
North Dakota Tribal College System

Advancing tribal colleges through collaboration and shared goals. ndtcs leverages the higher education experience by sharing ideas and broadening networks and alliances, toward improving students' outcomes.

Education
3
Tatanka Wanbli Society

A nonprofit organization dedicated to the retention of indigenous cultures, traditions and spirituality. We provide information and educational resources to Native American people, aid in the re-establishment of strong familial and…

Human Services
4
Native Healing Llc
Animals
5
The Tiwahe Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen indigenous leadership and cultural identity.

Human Services
6
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
7
Feather River Tribal Health Inc

To elevate the health status of the American Indian people in our service area and all people in our communities to the highest level possible through a comprehensive system of preventive and therapeutic services.

Health
8
Cihuapactli Collective

The Cihuapactli Collective's purpose is to provide healing for urban Indigenous Peoples from the diaspora. This is done by sharing wisdom, connecting resources, revitalizing Traditional Knowledge, promoting and advocating for health &…

Arts & Culture
9
Little Priest Tribal College

Little priest tribal college is established as an educational institution by the winnebago tribe of nebraska to fulfill the goal of its namesake, chief little priest, "be strong and educate my children".

Education
10
Central Wisconsin Indigenous Peoples Day
Arts & Culture
11
Toiyabe Indian Health Project

The mission of the toiyabe indian health project is to provide healthcare and promotion wellness to indian communities. toiyabe is a consortium of seven federally recognized tribes and to native american communities.

Health
12
Division of Indian Work

Division of indian work's mission is to support and strengthen urban american indian people through culturally-based education, traditional healing approaches, and leadership development. we achieve this by focusing on community and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oyate Teca Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kul Wicasa Wopasi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPIRIT LAKE TRIBE: $824,643 · OtherSPIRIT LAKE TRIBEROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE: $758,090 · OtherROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBESANTEE SIOUX NATION OF NEBRASKA: $485,075 · OtherSANTEE SIOUX NATION OF NEBRASKASINTE GLESKA COLLEGE CENTER INC: $405,518 · OtherSINTE GLESKA COLLEGE CENTER INCYANKTON SIOUX TRIBE: $347,710 · OtherWINNEBAGO TRIBE OF NEBRASKA: $326,861 · OtherMISSOURI BREAKS INDUSTRIES RESEARCH INC: $293,651 · OtherROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE - MCH DEP: $263,814 · Other+49 more: $3,767,640 · Other+49 moreOYATE TECA PROJECT INC: $400,859 · PhilanthropyDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $79,500 · Human ServicesTrenton Indian Service Area: $51,515 · Human ServicesINDIAN CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWhere all Women are Honored Winyan Wicayuonihan Oyanke: $31,875 · Human ServicesWILD HORSE BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $31,875 · Human ServicesKEYA FOUNDATION LLC: $114,809 · EducationLOWER BRULE COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC: $66,000 · EducationKUL WICASA WOPASI: $30,500 · EducationTURTLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $18,413 · EducationOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE: $30,960 · HealthAvera McKennan: $19,615 · HealthAMERICAN INDIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthWINNEBAGO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTRIBAL NATIONS RESEARCH GROUP: $20,000 · Social ScienceTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$7,473,002Philanthropy$400,859Human Services$244,765Education$229,722Health$74,575Social Science$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOYATE TECA PROJECT INC: $400,859 over 5y, 28% of budgetKEYA FOUNDATION LLC: $114,809 over 1y, 24% of budgetDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $79,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetLOWER BRULE COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC: $66,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTrenton Indian Service Area: $51,515 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetWhere all Women are Honored Winyan Wicayuonihan Oyanke: $31,875 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetWILD HORSE BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $31,875 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE: $30,960 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNEBRASKA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH COALITION INC: $26,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRIBAL NATIONS RESEARCH GROUP: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAvera McKennan: $19,615 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $18,413 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWINNEBAGO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OYATE TECA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYA FOUNDATION LLC ↗
  • Who funds DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LOWER BRULE COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Trenton Indian Service Area ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO40.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Native Governance Center · National Indian Health Board · Indian Land Tenure Foundation · Ndn Collective Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Wounded Warriors Family Support Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Prevent Child Abuse North Dakota · The Fund for Animals Inc · Association of Tribal Archives Libraries & Museums

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph