Skip to content

· Private foundation

Graves Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$412kInternational$217kEmployment$183kYouth Development$99kHuman Services$85kFood & Nutrition$65kHealth$56kReligion$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $108k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY SHIPS$36,000
CHRISTIAN OUTREACH FOOD MINISTRIES$35,000
Individual grant recipient$18,500
JOSH HULME MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$18,000
CROWELL METHODIST CHURCH$9,000
THE CENTER-PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER IN VERNON$7,500
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY COMPASSION CENTER INC$7,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HARRISBURG IL$4,000
HARRISBURG MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$3,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$1,000
CREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INDIAN LAND TENURE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$942k · 12 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$942k
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+7%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Mercy Ships International
    4× · 2020–2024 · $199k · revenue +126%
  • TS
    THE SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $160k · revenue +104%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOUTHEAST ILLINOIS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • TO
    THE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +84%
  • VC
    VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
2
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor Health Care System

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Scott & White Foundation Brenham

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Brenham, to encourage broad-based public support of Baylor Scott & White Health, and to advance its medical objectives, including patient care, and…

Health
7
Scott & White Healthcare

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Philanthropy
8
Marshall Hospital Foundation

It is the mission of the marshall hospital foundation to promote growth of gsmc-marshall through a broad-based program of funding and to support the hospitals mission to identify and provide exemplary healthcare in a safe and caring…

Philanthropy
9
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
12
Memorial Hermann Foundation

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harrisburg Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $245,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherTHE SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $57,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTIAN OUTREACH FOOD MINISTRIES: $47,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN OUTREACH FOOD MINISTRIESGRAVES-ASHBER SCHOLARSHIP HARRISBURG SCHOLARSHIP: $40,000 · OtherJOSH HULME MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP: $40,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST ILLINOIS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP: $32,000 · OtherTHE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE CENTER-PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER IN VERNON: $27,500 · Other+18 more: $141,500 · Other+18 moreMercy Ships International: $199,000 · InternationalMercy Ships Interna…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $88,500 · Youth DevelopmentBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $15,000 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthHarrisburg Medical Center Foundation: $3,000 · HealthINDIAN LAND TENURE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS: $1,000 · Human ServicesRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$821,000International$199,000Youth Development$88,500Health$23,000Human Services$11,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMercy Ships International: $199,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $88,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN LAND TENURE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARDEMAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetHarrisburg Medical Center Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC ↗
  • Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN LAND TENURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARDEMAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Harrisburg Medical Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATED WITH PURPOSE OF WEST TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Graves Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Graves Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Graves Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Graves Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Graves’ filings →

    More from the funding graph