Skip to content

· Community foundation

Gratiot County Community Foundation

To receive and accept property that will be exclusively used for charitable purposes, primarily for the benefit of Gratiot County residents and institutions.

$610k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$337kHuman Services$254kPublic Safety & Disaster$224kArts & Culture$184kHousing & Shelter$146kYouth Development$131kCrime & Legal$124kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 33 grants below total $341,399, the rows itemized in this filing. The $610,094 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $268,695 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $235k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Women's Resource Center$16,200
Gratiot Emergency Housing Corp$16,000
Ithaca North Elementary School$15,050
Fulton Elementary$15,050
Eugene M Nikkari Elementary$15,050
Ashley Community Schools$15,050
Ithaca South Elementary School$15,050
Breckenridge Elementary School$15,050
Carrie Knause Elementary$15,050
Gratiot County Hope House$15,000
United Way of Greater Central Michigan$15,000
Heroes Center$15,000
Alma Police Department$12,000
Village of Breckenridge$10,000
Commission on Aging$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WINGS OF MERCY EAST MICHIGAN: $15k → 14%WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CTR: $9k → 19%SENIOR ACTIVITY BLDG BD: $35k → 12%SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD: $24k → 12%Mid-Michigan Big Brothers Big Sisters: $10k → 19%SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD: $20k → 12%SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD: $17k → 12%SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD: $10k → 12%SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD: $10k → 12%Office of Human Services: $9k → 12%CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 41 repeat orgs$527k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
38

Total granted

$3.1M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+7%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $82k · revenue +64%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICHIGAN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • GC
    Gratiot County Players Inc
    2× · 2017–2021 · $34k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRATIOT COUNTY HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • GC
    GRAT CO FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
  • FF
    FAIR FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
2
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
3
Gratiot Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and community growth and development and prepserve the competitive enterprise system of business.

—
4
Midland County Council On Aging

Our mission is to promote and enrich quality of life for older adults and those who care for them by collaboratively providing meaningful services and opportunities.

Human Services
5
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
6
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
7
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
8
Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of Michigan

Providing patient support, community connections, education and advocacy.

Health
9
Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police Inc

Information dissemination.

—
10
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
11
Michigan Area Ambulance Service Inc

Provide rural ambulance service to several communities and provide training in the areas of safety and emergency services to ambulance service staff and the general public.

Health
12
Minot Commission On Aging Inc

The Agencys mission is to provide meals and health services to senior citizens in a seven county area.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mymichigan Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Gratiot County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL OTHER GRANTS LESS THAN 5000: $628,035 · OtherALL OTHER GRANTS LESS THAN 5000CITY OF ALMA: $349,176 · OtherCITY OF ALMAST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $241,344 · OtherST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLSITHACA SOUTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $221,719 · OtherITHACA SOUTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOLASHLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $140,434 · Other+66 more: $1,743,109 · Other+66 moreSENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD INC: $115,550 · Human ServicesWINGS OF MERCY EAST MICHIGAN INC: $14,530 · Human ServicesMID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC: $9,823 · Human ServicesOFFICE OF HUMAN SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $8,500 · Human ServicesMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $21,300 · HealthPardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Gratiot County: $17,200 · HealthALMA COMMUNITY ART CENTER INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN ARTS ACCESS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureHeart of Michigan Sweet Adelines: $6,000 · Arts & CultureGRATIOT COUNTY HOPE HOUSE: $27,705 · Housing & ShelterMAPLE VIEW RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $5,058 · Housing & ShelterGRATIOT COUNTY FAIR FOR YOUTH: $31,849 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL MICHIGAN YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $7,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,323,817Human Services$167,403Health$38,500Arts & Culture$35,500Housing & Shelter$32,763Recreation & Sports$31,849Youth Development$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD INC: $115,550 over 6y, 89% of budgetGRATIOT EMERGENCY HOUSING CORPORATI: $87,934 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION: $82,428 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY: $39,985 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetGratiot County Players Inc: $33,630 over 2y, 19% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY FAIR FOR YOUTH: $31,849 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY HOPE HOUSE: $27,705 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $21,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALMA COMMUNITY ART CENTER INC: $17,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetPardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Gratiot County: $17,200 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMid-Michigan District Health Dept: $15,735 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY EAST MICHIGAN INC: $14,530 over 1y, 17% of budgetCENTRAL MICHIGAN YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $14,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMICHIGAN ARTS ACCESS: $12,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSME EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY ACADEMY INC: $9,823 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $8,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAY DREAMS INC: $5,975 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetMAPLE VIEW RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $5,058 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENIOR ACTIVITY BUILDING BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds GRATIOT EMERGENCY HOUSING CORPORATI ↗
  • Who funds GRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds GRATIOT COUNTY HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Gratiot County Players Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRATIOT COUNTY FAIR FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds GRATIOT COUNTY HOPE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Central MichiganMI28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Central Michigan · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd · The Charles J Strosacker Foundation · Yeo & Yeo Foundation · The Isabella Bank Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · Mymichigan Health · Saginaw Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gratiot County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gratiot County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gratiot County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph