Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Granoff Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$244kCivil Rights$150kEducation$131kPhilanthropy$129kHealth$38kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$605Community Improvement$350Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$5,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$968k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH$20,700
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$15,000
TEMPLE BETH-EL$10,000
TEMPLE BETH-EL$5,300
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$5,250
PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$5,000
BRYANT UNIVERSITY$2,500
CARON TREATMENT CENTER$1,000
PLAY FOR PINK$400
THE AQUIDNECK FOOD PANTRY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UJA FEDERATION: $3k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $22k → 11%TEMPLE HABONIM: $3k → 7%BRYANT UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $15k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $22k → 11%TEMPLE HABONIM: $3k → 7%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $22k → 11%TEMPLE HABONIM: $3k → 7%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $21k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $21k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $18k → 11%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $23k → 14%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $18k → 14%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $15k → 14%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $15k → 14%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $15k → 14%RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN: $8k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $43k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $26k → 11%NEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $36k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $15k → 11%NEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $36k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $10k → 11%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $6k → 11%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $6k → 11%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $5k → 11%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $25k → 14%NEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $18k → 14%NEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $18k → 14%NEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $18k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $8k → 14%TEMPLE BETH-EL: $5k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
RI
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$567k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$567k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $94k · revenue +11%
  • PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +42%
  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • TA
    THE AMI-DA INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +12%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

8
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ami-Da Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr18%13%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr18%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr18%1%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr18%60%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
10%
646/6,389

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND — $150,000 · OtherJEWISH ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLANDNEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC — $126,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCTEMPLE BETH-EL — $68,350 · OtherTEMPLE BETH-ELCONGREGATION OF THE SONS OF ISRAEL AND DAVID DBA TEMPLE BETH-EL — $47,875 · OtherCONGREGATION OF THE SONS OF ISRAEL AND DAVID DBA TEMPLE BETH-ELPROVIDENCE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL — $20,000 · Other+21 more — $17,519 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $124,900 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…+1 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropyRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $94,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHO…PROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEG…+2 more — $3,200 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $20,250 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health+5 more — $1,875 · HealthRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $3,000 · Arts & CulturePLAY FOR PINK INC — $2,950 · Crime & LegalTHE AMI-DA INSTITUTE INC — $1,800 · Religion
Other$429,744Philanthropy$127,900Education$109,200Health$32,125Arts & Culture$3,000Crime & Legal$2,950Religion$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $124,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $94,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $20,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $2,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRYANT UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMI-DA INSTITUTE INC — $1,800 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE AMI-DA INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AQUIDNECK FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Granoff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph