Skip to content

· Private foundation

Graham Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$768kEducation$524kAnimals$494kCivil Rights$76kFood & Nutrition$23k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONORS CHOOSEORG$52,500
EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND$48,000
CITY OF HOPE$40,000
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$35,000
LIGHTHOUSE GUILD$32,000
PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT$30,000
BERKELEY SOCIAL WELFARE STUDENT AID FUND$20,000
HUNTER COLLEGE MOTHER'S DAY FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND: $50k → 16%LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $45k → 10%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $31k → 10%CITY OF HOPE: $40k → 14%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $35k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $110k → 17%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $18k → 18%EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND: $50k → 16%LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $36k → 10%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $30k → 10%CITY OF HOPE: $20k → 14%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $33k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $57k → 17%EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND: $48k → 16%LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $30k → 10%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $30k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $30k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $53k → 17%EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION THE SAMFUND: $40k → 16%LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $16k → 10%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $30k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $30k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $45k → 17%EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND: $25k → 16%NOT IN OUR TOWN A PROJECT OF THE WORKING GROUP: $17k → 10%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $30k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $30k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $30k → 17%SAM FUND: $25k → 16%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $30k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $30k → 6%DONORS CHOOSEORG: $21k → 17%SAM FUND: $20k → 16%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $26k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $28k → 6%SAM FUND: $16k → 16%PAWS - PETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT: $23k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $28k → 6%LIGHTHOUSE GUILD: $32k → 17%THE SAM FUND: $16k → 16%PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $19k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA: $24k → 6%LIGHTHOUSE GUILD: $32k → 17%BERKELEY SOCIAL WELFARE STUDENT AID FUND: $20k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE GUILD: $17k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR LYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES: $55k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR LYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 14 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+23%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    7× · 2017–2025 · $331k · revenue +24%
  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $268k · revenue +18%
  • LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • CU
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • EM
    EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION THE SAMFUND
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • PP
    PAWS - PETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
2
Association of American Law Schools Inc

The association of american law schools' mission is to uphold and advance excellence in legal education.

Education
3
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
4
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Inc

Serve as a leader, alongside diverse coalitions, in identifying and reforming flaws and inequities in the criminal legal system, and redressing systemic racism, and ensuring that its members and others in the criminal defense bar are fully…

—
5
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
6
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
7
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
12
National Education Association of the United States

Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Poverty Law Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Samfund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECT: $226,250 · OtherPAWS A PROGRAM OF SHANTI PROJECTEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUND: $173,000 · OtherEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION SAMFUNDHUNTER COLLEGE MOTHER'S DAY FUND: $99,000 · OtherHUNTER COLLEGE MOTHER'S DAY FUNDLIGHTHOUSE GUILD: $81,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE GUILDCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR LYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES: $80,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR LYMPHOID MALIGNANCIESTHE SAMFUND INC: $77,000 · OtherTHE SAMFUND INCCITY OF HOPE: $60,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPECOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $45,000 · OtherEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION THE SAMFUND: $40,000 · Other+4 more: $92,000 · Other+4 moreDONORSCHOOSEORG: $330,500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGOAKLAND PROMISE: $22,250 · EducationOAKLAND PROMISE+1 more: $10,000 · EducationNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $267,950 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIM…LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $211,500 · HealthLIFELONG MED…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $18,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$973,250Education$362,750Animals$267,950Health$211,500Civil Rights$50,000Crime & Legal$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $330,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $267,950 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $211,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAMFUND INC: $77,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE: $22,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Working Group: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Working Group ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Graham Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Graham Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Graham Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Graham Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Graham Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph