Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace Tptc Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$940k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$875kReligion$762kPublic Benefit$73kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$15kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $550k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITY REVIVAL MOVEMENT$250,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$150,000
KINGDOM ENCOUNTER MINISTRIES$100,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
OASIS WORLD MINSTRIES INC$100,000
BURDEN BEARERS INC$47,500
GLORIOUS GOSPEL MISSIONS$42,000
LIFE CHANGERS$20,000
DOVE INTERNATIONAL$15,000
OUTBOUND LIFE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OUTBOUND LIFE: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$427k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+1838%

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $192k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $285k · revenue +24%
  • TK
    The Kingdom Encounter Ministries Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +22% · 66% of their budget
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • SF
    SEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue ×19
  • VC
    VINEYARD CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
4
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
5
Connect the World

The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…

Religion
6
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
7
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
8
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
9
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
10
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
11
Keith Wheeler Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
12
Kingdom Missions International

Religious- Sharing the Gospel and the love of Christ with others.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifechangers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Outboundlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITY REVIVAL MOVEMENT INC: $375,000 · ReligionUNITY REVIVAL MOVEMENT INCOASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INC: $275,000 · ReligionOASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INCThe Kingdom Encounter Ministries Inc: $200,000 · ReligionThe Kingdom Encounter Ministries IncSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSESEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · Religion+1 more: $15,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $285,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MI…Compassion International Incorporated: $100,000 · InternationalCompassion International…CONVOY OF HOPE: $25,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…BURDEN BEARERS: $72,500 · OtherBURDEN BEARERSVINEYARD CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherVINEYARD CHURCHGLORIOUS GOSPEL MISSIONS: $42,000 · OtherGLORIOUS GOSPEL MI…VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $25,000 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTY…NORTHWESTERN MEDIA: $10,000 · OtherLIFECHANGERS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOUTBOUNDLIFE INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Religion$1,115,000International$410,000Other$299,500Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $285,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INC: $275,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetThe Kingdom Encounter Ministries Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 66% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECHANGERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetOUTBOUNDLIFE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grace Tptc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace Tptc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace Tptc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph