Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace Knight Babson Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2021
10
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$187k
02FY2021 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,219
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$16,219
WELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING$16,219
WELLESLEY HILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$16,219
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIETY$16,219
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$16,219
ST PAUL'S PARISH$16,219
TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM$16,219
WELLESLEY VILLAGE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$16,219
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST$16,219
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH$16,219
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $16k → 7%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $16k → 8%WELLESLEY VILLAGE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $16k → 7%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 8%WELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING: $16k → 7%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 8%ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1k → 7%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 8%WELLESLEY CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 8%WELLESLEY CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%ST PAUL'S PARISH: $16k → 8%ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 7%ST PAUL'S PARISH: $1k → 8%TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $16k → 7%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $16k → 7%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH: $16k → 7%WELLESLEY HILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $16k → 7%UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIETY: $16k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $1k → 7%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%WELLESLEY HILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $1k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $1k → 7%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%WELLESLEY HILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $1k → 7%ELMWOOD CHAPEL: $1k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $1k → 7%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST: $1k → 7%ELMWOOD CHAPEL: $1k → 7%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%WELLESLEY HILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 7%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST: $500 → 7%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 10 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$122k
$65k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • UU
    UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • WF
    WELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2021.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2021, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20,219 · OtherST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $20,219 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHTEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $20,219 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELOHIMFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WELLESLEY HILLS: $19,219 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WELLESLEY HILLSST PAULS PARISH: $17,219 · OtherST PAULS PARISHFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $17,219 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTISTUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIETY: $16,219 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIETYST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH: $16,219 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCHWELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING INC: $16,219 · OtherWELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING INCWELLESLEY VILLAGE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $16,219 · OtherWELLESLEY VILLAGE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH+4 more: $7,500 · Other
Other$186,690

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Babson - Webber - Mustard FundMA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Babson - Webber - Mustard Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grace Knight Babson Fund?

Find your warmest path to Grace Knight Babson Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grace Knight Babson’s filings →

More from the funding graph