Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace and Richard Okita Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Education$142kAnimals$36kArts & Culture$16kHealth$8kScience & Tech$4kRecreation & Sports$1kEnvironment$1kPhilanthropy$125Other$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$885k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEARTS ACADEMY$10,000
SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL$10,000
DAMIEN MEMORIAL SCHOOL$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$10,000
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII$5,000
HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
CABRILLO HIGH SCHOOL AQUARIUM$2,500
CANINE COMPANIONS$2,500
FRIENDS-HAWAII VOLCANOES NATL PARK$2,500
REHAB FOUNDATION$2,500
EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION$1,000
PEARL HARBOR AVIATION MUSEUM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANINE COMPANIONS: $2k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
OR
OH
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 14 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$199k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+75%

Still filing today

64%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +11%
  • ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII
    4× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +74%
  • RH
    Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IF
    IEEE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • CH
    CABRILLO HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
3
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
The Aopa Foundation Inc

See schedule oto promote, advance and encourage aviation and airport safety and security and the research and testing in the support thereof; to educate the public and users of the national air transportation system to the value and…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Hawaii State Teachers Association

Served hsta members as their exclusive collective bargaining agent,administered members' contract negotiations with the state of hawaiiconcerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, fringe benefits, hoursand other employment conditions.

—
7
Hawaii Pacific University

Hawaii pacific university is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. students from around the world join us for an american education built on a liberal arts foundation. our innovative undergraduate…

Education
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
American Society of Anesthesiologists

Advancing the practice and securing the future of anesthesiology through medical education, creation and dissemination of new knowledge, improvement of patient care, and legislative and regulatory advocacy.

—
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaiian Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Straub Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS SCHOOLTHE CONGREGATION OF CHRISTIAN BROTHERS OF HAWAII INC: $34,000 · OtherTHE CONGREGATION OF CHRISTIAN BROTHERS OF HAWAII INCSACRED HEARTS ACADEMY: $34,000 · OtherSACRED HEARTS ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCABRILLO HIGH SCHOOL AQUARIUM: $4,500 · Other+10 more: $12,375 · Other+10 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASH…AIR & SPACE FORCES ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · EducationAIR & SPACE FORCES…IEEE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · EducationTHE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · EducationASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII: $13,500 · AnimalsASSISTANCE …HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsHAWAIIAN HU…PEARL HARBOR AVIATION MUSEUM: $6,100 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK: $5,500 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureRehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation: $8,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $8,000 · Human Services
Other$129,875Education$37,000Animals$21,500Arts & Culture$16,600Health$8,100Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII: $13,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEARL HARBOR AVIATION MUSEUM: $6,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK: $5,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAIR & SPACE FORCES ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStraub Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEARL HARBOR AVIATION MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AIR & SPACE FORCES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IEEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds Straub Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J Watumull FundHI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J Watumull Fund · Aloha United Way Inc · Atherton Family Foundation · The Strong Foundation · McInerny Foundation-- · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grace and Richard Okita Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace and Richard Okita Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace and Richard Okita’s filings →

    More from the funding graph