Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gr and Grace M Sponaugle Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$200kHealth$135kArts & Culture$74kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$3kEnvironment$3kYouth Development$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$1,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE HEALTH$25,000
BEN AND TIM DAY INC$13,628
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY$1,250
SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY$1,250
PENNSYLVANIA'S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION$1,250
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$1,250
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $1k → 12%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$376k · 24 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$376k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+17%

Still filing today

46%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PENNON ORGANIZATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $71k · revenue +89%
  • PS
    Penn State Health
    2× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue ×183
  • BO
    BRIDGE OF HOPE HARRISBURG AREA
    3× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue +34%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -5%
  • TN
    THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURGgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
5
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

8
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
9
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
10
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit and the most unlike its peers is Cocoa Packs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Care Systems and Ser…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Patient Financial AssistanceArts & Culture OrganizationsFaith-Based Food and Emerge…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr14%9%35–55yr17%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%57%10–20yr18%5%20–35yr14%2%35–55yr17%35%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
10%
3,242/31,375

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEN & TIM DAY INC — $91,469 · OtherBEN & TIM DAY INCPENN STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT — $83,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENTTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $20,800 · OtherTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYPENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $14,750 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYHARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $8,750 · Other+18 more — $41,250 · Other+18 morePENNON ORGANIZATION — $71,000 · Arts & CulturePENNON ORGANIZATIONNATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $750 · Arts & CultureSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $27,200 · EducationSAINT JOSEPH'…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFER…DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $3,750 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIV…WAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG — $2,500 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $2,500 · Education+2 more — $2,500 · EducationPenn State Health — $26,400 · HealthGAUDENZIA INC — $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthBRIDGE OF HOPE HARRISBURG AREA — $5,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHOICES HEALTHCARE — $1,500 · Human ServicesCOCOA PACKS INC — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$260,019Arts & Culture$74,250Education$50,950Health$28,900Human Services$8,500Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION — $71,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $27,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPenn State Health — $26,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE HARRISBURG AREA — $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOCOA PACKS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOICES HEALTHCARE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAUDENZIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAACA MUSEUM INC — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HARRISBURG AREA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNON ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Penn State Health
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE HARRISBURG AREA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
  • Who funds COCOA PACKS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM
  • Who funds WAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG
  • Who funds ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD
  • Who funds CHOICES HEALTHCARE
  • Who funds The George Washington University
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GAUDENZIA INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AACA MUSEUM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Capital RegionPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · Hall Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Fasnacht Family Foundation · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gr and Grace M Sponaugle Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gr and Grace M Sponaugle Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gr and Grace M Sponaugle Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph