Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goyal Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$227kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$21kEducation$20kCivil Rights$20kReligion$17kFood & Nutrition$12kScience & Tech$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$42,000
American Physiology Society$5,000
India Development Arpana Research$5,000
American Pancreatic Association$5,000
Ramakrishna Vedanta Society of Mass$1,000
GLOBALCURESORG$1,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Boston Cardiac Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC$300
SALVATION ARMY OF MASS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $11k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $3k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $1k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $1k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $1k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $1k → 8%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $1k → 8%SAHELI: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
KS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 16 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
21

Total granted

$253k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+148%

Still filing today

38%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    American Physiological Society
    2× · 2021–2022 · $70k · revenue +78%
  • IC
    INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +295%
  • BC
    BOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IH
    Indian Health Information Portal
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AG
    AMERICAN GASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • AI
    ANMS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Rhode Island Quality Institute

To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Amrita Institute of Advanced Research

To be recognized leader in science and technoto advance research in ai and data sciences.to explore application in healthcare,. education and in social sciences. to develop innovative courses and educational material.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio

To use the resources and knowledge of the organization for the health and welfare of the community served through educational programs, medical assistance and medical research.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is Indian Medical Association of New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indian Health Information Portal: $50,000 · OtherIndian Health Information PortalIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $37,000 · OtherBRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITALLA JOLLA INSTITUTE OF NEUROGASTROEN: $28,000 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE OF NEUROGASTROENINDIAN SOC OF WORCESTER: $20,250 · OtherINDIAN SOC OF WORCESTERAMERICAN GASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherANMS INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+25 more: $52,590 · Other+25 moreAmerican Physiological Society: $70,000 · HealthAmerican Physiological S…INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $17,100 · HealthINDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATI…+1 more: $200 · HealthTIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC: $900 · Community ImprovementINDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC): $18,793 · Human ServicesSAHELI INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · InternationalPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $1,000 · EducationAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$258,840Health$87,300Community Improvement$25,900Human Services$19,793International$6,000Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Physiological Society: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetINDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC): $18,793 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetINDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $17,100 over 2y, 38% of budgetBOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICAN PENCREATIC ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAHELI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISION-AID INCORPORATED: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Physiological Society ↗
  • Who funds TIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC) ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PENCREATIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds SAHELI INC ↗
  • Who funds NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goyal Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goyal Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 61%
  • Saheli Inc: 61% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Goyal Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Goyal Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goyal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph