Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Governors Cup Foundation Inc

The specific purpose of this corporation is to provide a forum for open discussion and the exchange of ideas on, and provide funding for research, education, and scholarship relateing to important public policy, scentific and hunanitarian issues.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$195kHuman Services$113kRecreation & Sports$50kFood & Nutrition$50kHealth$30kEnvironment$25kCommunity Improvement$25kYouth Development$25k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$902k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH SAC FOOD CLOSET$25,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$25,000
RANCHO CEILO$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Make A Wish Foundation: $25k → 12%WHY CANT WE MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $25k → 14%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%Jordans Guardian Angels: $15k → 12%SAINT JOHNS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$395k · 4 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$395k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JG
    JORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +58%
  • MG
    MORTON GOLF FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $65k · revenue +81%
  • SS
    SOUTH SACRAMENTO INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • WC
    Why Cant We Make A Difference
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -89%
  • GS
    GROWER SHIPPER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • MB
    Mama Bears
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mollys Angels
Philanthropy
2
Moms Against Racism and Injustice

MARI acts as a resource organization emphasizing the importance of our collective history through community education, and ultimately help eliminate racism and injustice.

Civil Rights
3
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Mission Graduates

Mission graduates (the organization") is a california nonprofit benefit organization that empowers youth and their families on the path to higher education, equipping them for fulfilling careers that will strengthen generations. founded in…

5
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
6
The Jim Saunders Fund

Providing for educational scholarships and grants to individuals with the goal of assisting them to continually seek knowledge. additionally, to provide grants to individuals who have experienced a catastrophic event or an emergency…

Philanthropy
7
Mike's Kids
Philanthropy
8
A Mothers Love

Help for mothers

Human Services
9
Transitional Youth Mobilizing for Change

The mission of TYM4Change is to empower youth to achieve their full potential and become agents of change in their communities through learning, research, and action.

Youth Development
10
Junior League of San Jose

The junior league of san jose is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
11
Sacramento Kings Foundation
12
West Marin Scholarship Program

The Primary Mission is To Provide Need Based Scholarships To Individuals.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michelles Place Cancer Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Mama Bears. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OAKLAND MILITARY INSTITUTE COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $180,000 · EducationOAKLAND MILITARY INSTITUTE COLLEGE PREP…JORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $100,000 · Human ServicesJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELSWhy Cant We Make A Difference — $25,000 · Human ServicesWhy Cant We Make A Differenc…+1 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH SACRAMENTO INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 · OtherSOUTH SACRAMENTO…GROWER SHIPPER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherGROWER SHIPPER F…MORTON GOLF FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsMORTON GOLF FO…RANCHO CIELO INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMama Bears — $25,000 · EnvironmentMICHELLES PLACE CANCER RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 · Health
Education$180,000Human Services$127,500Other$75,000Recreation & Sports$65,000Youth Development$25,000Environment$25,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOAKLAND MILITARY INSTITUTE COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $180,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $100,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMORTON GOLF FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetSOUTH SACRAMENTO INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWhy Cant We Make A Difference — $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Governors Cup Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Governors Cup Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Governors Cup Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph