Skip to content

· Public charity

Government Accountability Alliance

The organization advocates on behalf of taxpayers at the illinois capitol and across the state.

$2.1M
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$3.5MCivil Rights$1.2MEmployment$350k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$350,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 1 NFP$1,240,000
COMMON SENSE REFORMS$425,000
AMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND$350,000
VOTER PROTECTION NFP$50,000
ILLINOIS POLICY PAC$24,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CONCORD FUND: $375k → 14%ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $1.6M → 14%US TERM LIMITS: $27k → 14%ILLINOIS POLICY PAC: $23k → 14%AMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND: $350k → 14%AMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $4k → 14%VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 1 NFP: $1.2M → 14%VOTE NO ON ILLINOIS CORRUPTION NFP: $457k → 14%COMMON SENSE REFORMS: $425k → 14%AMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $125k → 14%VOTER PROTECTION NFP: $50k → 14%ILLINOIS POLICY PAC: $24k → 14%ILLINOIS POLICY PAC: $23k → 14%ILLINOIS POLICY PAC: $23k → 14%ILLINOIS OPPORTUNITY PROJECT: $355k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
2
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

—
3
Institute for Research on Presidential Elections

To educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a Nationwide Popular Vote Election of the President of the United States by providing objectively-determined information, data, analyses, and studies aimed at improving

Civil Rights
4
National Popular Vote

To educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a Nationwide Popular Vote Election of the President of the United States

Public Benefit
5
American Independent Media

To educate and inform growing audiences with engaging content through distribution channels.

Public Benefit
6
Government Accountability Alliance

The organization advocates on behalf of taxpayers at the illinois capitol and across the state. it does this by drafting legislation, offering testimony, encouraging grassroots involvement and encouraging pro-free enterprise positions on…

Civil Rights
7
Advance Illinois Nfp

Advance illinois was founded in 2008 as an independent policy and advocacy organization that works toward a heathy public education system that prepares students to achieve success in college, career, and civic life. advance illinois is…

Education
8
Change Illinois Action Fund

Change illinois action fund is dedicated to advocating for solutions to the issues that undermine democracy and government efficiency in illinois, including restricted ballot access, uncompetitive elections, decreased citizen…

—
9
Illinois Fiscal Policy Council
Public Benefit
10
Change Illinois

Change illinois is dedicated to activities that promote honest and effective government, open elections, and high levels of voter participation in illinois.

Civil Rights
11
The Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research Inc

To promote the ideals of free market economics, individual liberty, and limited government through the conduct of public opinion research.

Social Science
12
Reform for Illinois

Conducts research on government trends, advocates reforms and hosts educational events to promote public participation in government, addresses the role of money in politics, and encourges integrity, accountability, and transparency in…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Opportunity Project; the most unlike its peers is The Concord Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 1 NFP: $1,240,000 · OtherVOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 1 NFPVOTE NO ON ILLINOIS CORRUPTION NFP: $456,932 · OtherVOTE NO ON ILLINOIS CORRUPTION NFPCOMMON SENSE REFORMS: $425,000 · OtherCOMMON SENSE REFORMSThe Concord Fund: $375,000 · OtherThe Concord FundAMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND: $350,000 · OtherAMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND+3 more: $147,400 · OtherILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $1,566,853 · Public BenefitILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTEILLINOIS OPPORTUNITY PROJECT: $355,000 · Public BenefitILLINOIS OPPORTUNITY PROJECTAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $151,700 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT
Other$2,994,332Public Benefit$2,073,553

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $1,566,853 over 1y, 18% of budgetVOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 1 NFP: $1,240,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetVOTE NO ON ILLINOIS CORRUPTION NFP: $456,932 over 1y, 96% of budgetILLINOIS OPPORTUNITY PROJECT: $355,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $151,700 over 3y, 11% of budgetVOTER PROTECTION NFP: $50,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetUS TERM LIMITS INC: $27,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Government Accountability Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Government Accountability Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $755 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Government Accountability Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph