Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Government Accountability Alliance

The organization advocates on behalf of taxpayers at the illinois capitol and across the state. It does this by drafting legislation, offering testimony, encouraging grassroots involvement and encouraging pro-free enterprise positions on bills.

$2.1M
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
5
Organizations funded FY2022
80%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$350,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$1,240,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 5
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
2
Total assets, FY2022
$935k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 80% of the organizations Government Accountability Alliance funded were first-time grantees, receiving 99% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Public BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20225$2.1M80%
FY20212$50k50%
FY20204$980k50%
FY20192$27k100%
FY20172$1.9Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$3.5MCivil Rights$1.2MEmployment$350k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Illinois Policy Institute$1,566,853118%
Vote No on Amendment 1 Nfp$1,240,000139%
Vote No on Illinois Corruption Nfp$456,932196%
Common Sense Reforms$425,0001n/a
The Concord Fund$375,0001n/a
Illinois Opportunity Project$355,000111%
American Jobs and Growth Fund$350,0001n/a
American Culture Project$151,700311%
Illinois Policy PAC$70,4003n/a
Voter Protection Nfp$50,0001100%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Government Accountability Alliance by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Illinois Policy Institute$1,566,853118%
Vote No on Amendment 1 Nfp$1,240,000139%
Vote No on Illinois Corruption Nfp$456,932196%
Common Sense Reforms$425,0001n/a
The Concord Fund$375,0001n/a
Illinois Opportunity Project$355,000111%
American Jobs and Growth Fund$350,0001n/a
American Culture Project$151,700311%
Illinois Policy PAC$70,4003n/a
Voter Protection Nfp$50,0001100%
US Term Limits Inc$27,00011%

Compare Government Accountability Alliance with peer funders

About Government Accountability Alliance

How much does Government Accountability Alliance give?
Government Accountability Alliance reported 5 grants totaling $2,089,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Government Accountability Alliance fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Public Benefit (69%), Civil Rights (24%), Employment (7%).
Who are Government Accountability Alliance's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Illinois Policy Institute ($1.6M), Vote No on Amendment 1 Nfp ($1.2M), Vote No on Illinois Corruption Nfp ($457k).
Does Government Accountability Alliance fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Government Accountability Alliance based?
Government Accountability Alliance is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $755 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Government Accountability Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph