Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gourlay Mary Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$43kEducation$22kHuman Services$8kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLS EYE FOUNDATION$5,600
VISIONLINK$5,000
CHESTNUT HILL MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VISIONLINK: $5k → 6%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $5k → 11%VISIONLINK: $3k → 6%CENTER FOR VISION LOSS: $3k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $3k → 11%ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 22%ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 5 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$59k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR BLIND
    3× · 2020–2022 · $14k · revenue +48%
  • SF
    SIGHTS FOR HOPE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +11%
  • THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NF
    NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF PA
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · 29% of their budget
  • TP
    THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Philadelphia Trustee Administering Wills Eye Hospital

Established in 1832 as a gift from james wills, a philadelphia merchant, to the city of philadelphia, wills eye's mission is to provide excellence in ophthalmic care to the community in need. see schedule o.

Health
2
Visionsservices for the Blind and Visually Impaired

Visions is a 98-year-old nonprofit vision rehabilitation and social service organization that trains low income people of all ages experiencing blindness and severe vision loss to lead independent and active lives at work, in their homes…

Human Services
3
St Louis Society for the Blind

The society enhances independence, empowers individuals and enriches the lives of people who are visually impaired or blind.

Health
4
Western Pennsylvania School for Blind Children

The mission of western pennsylvania school for blind children is to nurture the unique abilities of individuals with blindness and visual impairment through educational excellence and a lifetime of learning.

Education
5
Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc

Miami lighthouse through education, training, research, vision enhancement and as a center for learning provides hope, confidence, and independence for people of all ages. for nearly a century, miami lighthouse for the blind has been…

Human Services
6
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
7
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
8
Pennsylvania Vision Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
10
Melmark Inc

Melmark is a human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals within diverse communities with…

Human Services
11
The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
—
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Royer-Greaves School for Blind; the most unlike its peers is Chestnut Hill Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VisionLink: $18,000 · Human ServicesVisionLinkSIGHTS FOR HOPE: $11,000 · Human ServicesSIGHTS FOR HOPEROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR BLIND: $14,000 · OtherROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR BLINDNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF PA: $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIN…OVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $8,000 · EducationOVERBROOK SCHOOL FO…WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 · EducationWILLS EYE FOUNDATIO…THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $8,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDAT…THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHESTNUT HILL MEALS ON WHEELS: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$29,000Other$22,000Education$13,600Health$8,000Arts & Culture$5,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVisionLink: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR BLIND: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHTS FOR HOPE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF PA: $8,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gourlay Mary Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gourlay Mary Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gourlay Mary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph