Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gore Animal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$41kEnvironment$4kInternational$2kArts & Culture$130Health$100
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
2
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS CHICAGO$1,000
BROOKFIELD ZOO$700
SAVE A PET$700
ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY$700
SECOND CHANCES FOR BLIND DOGS$700
ORPHANS OF THE STORM$700
CURES WITHIN REACH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SECOND CHANCES FOR BLIND DOGS: $700 → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY: $700 → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $2k → 8%SECOND CHANCES FOR BLIND DOGS: $700 → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1k → 14%SECOND CHANCES FOR BLIND DOGS: $550 → 14%RIVERWOODS PRESERVATION COUNCIL: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1k → 14%RIVERWOODS PRESERVATION COUNCIL: $1k → 8%CURES WITHIN REACH: $500 → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1k → 8%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $1k → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1k → 8%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1k → 8%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1k → 8%RIVERWOODS PRESERVATION COUNCIL: $1k → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $1k → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $700 → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $1k → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $700 → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $1k → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $500 → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $1k → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $1k → 14%SAVE A PET: $1k → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $750 → 14%SAVE A PET: $700 → 8%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $700 → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $700 → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $500 → 14%CURES WITHIN REACH: $500 → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $1k → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $1k → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $1k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $700 → 14%BROOKFIELD ZOO: $700 → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 10 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$45k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+35%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +163%
  • OO
    ORPHANS OF THE STORM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +187%
  • TA
    The Anti-Cruelty Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +67%
  • FM
    FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $130 · revenue +28%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100 · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
2
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
3
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
8
Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

The mission of the Atlanta Humane Society is to improve animal welfare in the southeastern United States by providing quality animal services including preventative initiatives, education, advocacy and adoption of animals into permanent…

Animals
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
Best Friends Animal Society

To bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. we do this by demonstrating and promoting exemplary animal care and building community programs and partnerships.

Animals
11
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
12
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Anti-Cruelty Society; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAWS CHICAGO: $10,200 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOORPHANS OF THE STORM: $8,800 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORMThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $7,650 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty SocietyChicago Zoological Society: $5,465 · AnimalsChicago Zoological SocietySAVE-A-PET INC: $2,128 · AnimalsSAVE-A-PET INCHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,286 · Animals+2 more: $1,170 · AnimalsRIVERWOODS PRESERVATION COUNCIL: $3,636 · OtherRIVERWOODS PRESERV…SECOND CHANCES FOR BLIND DOGS: $1,950 · OtherSECOND CHANCES FOR…CURES WITHIN REACH: $1,950 · OtherCURES WITHIN REACH+1 more: $100 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 · InternationalFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $130 · Arts & Culture
Animals$36,699Other$7,636International$2,000Arts & Culture$130

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $10,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $8,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $7,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $5,465 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE-A-PET INC: $2,128 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,286 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds SAVE-A-PET INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gore Animal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gore Animal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gore Animal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph