Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon R Larson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.5MReligion$92kHousing & Shelter$33kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kEnvironment$4kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $192k
$1,065
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$191,692
MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS$5,857
UNION MISSION MINISTRIES$5,325
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,662
JUDEO CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER$2,132
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,065
ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN$1,065
SAMARITAN HOUSE$1,065
FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA$532
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA$532
Individual grant recipient$532
NATIONAL WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION$532
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $210k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $9k → 17%JUDEO CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $6k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $192k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $8k → 17%JUDEO CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $5k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $188k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $8k → 17%JUDEO CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $2k → 10%ST MARY'S CHURCH: $3k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $186k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $8k → 17%SAMARITAN HOUSE: $5k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $185k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $8k → 17%SAMARITAN HOUSE: $5k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $183k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $8k → 17%SAMARITAN HOUSE: $5k → 10%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $2k → 19%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $182k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $6k → 17%SAMARITAN HOUSE: $2k → 10%LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $175k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $5k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%SAMARITAN HOUSE: $1k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%MOBILE MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%UNION MISSION MINISTRIES: $5k → 19%UNION MISSION MINISTRIES: $5k → 19%UNION MISSION MINISTRIES: $5k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $4k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $4k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $1k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $1k → 19%SPCA NORFOLK CHAPTER: $1k → 10%ST MARY'S INFANT HOME: $1k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $1k → 19%ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 13 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+66%

Still filing today

46%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Samaritan House Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +42%
  • JO
    JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +67%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARYS CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S INFANT HOME
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • MM
    MOBILE MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
2
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
3
Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia Inc

Home of va ensures equal access to housing opportunities by building individual capacity, ensuring compliance with fair housing laws, and promoting effective public policy to advance housing justice.

Housing & Shelter
4
Washington Voa Living Center

Low-income housing.

—
5
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity of Northern Va

Habitat for humanity of northern virginia brings our community together to build decent, affordable houses - and hope - for people in need. habitat provides a "hand up" to home ownership through sweat equity, donor generosity, volunteer…

—
7
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
8
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
9
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
10
Voa Somerville Veterans Housing Inc

To provide housing and supportive services to the veterans of the united states military

—
11
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

—
12
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forkids Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $1,501,421 · OtherLITTLE FALLS COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOLMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $61,153 · Other+11 more: $64,776 · OtherSamaritan House Inc: $18,963 · Housing & ShelterJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $13,117 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $971 · Housing & ShelterFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $4,170 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,646 · HealthVIRGINIA BEACH SPCA: $515 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $515 · Animals
Other$1,627,350Housing & Shelter$33,051Food & Nutrition$4,170Health$2,646Animals$1,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSamaritan House Inc: $18,963 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $13,117 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN INC: $12,512 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $7,311 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $4,170 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,646 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $971 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA BEACH SPCA: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Samaritan House Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOME FOR DISABLED CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA BEACH SPCA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Townsend Family FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Townsend Family Foundation · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon R Larson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon R Larson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gordon R Larson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph