Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$359kHealth$341kPhilanthropy$215kHuman Services$161kReligion$151kAnimals$68kArts & Culture$65kYouth Development$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVENTURA TURNBERRY JEWISH CENTER$20,000
University of Miami$10,000
Temple Beth Shalom$10,000
University of Michigan$10,000
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
Broward Center For The Performing Arts Foundation$5,000
Helping Hands$5,000
DOGS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOGS INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CO
AR
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 24 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$1.5M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+106%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    7× · 2017–2024 · $239k · revenue +96%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +202%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc
    3× · 2019–2023 · $30k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • US
    University Schoolsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +106%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
—
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Barry University Inc

Barry university is a catholic institution of higher education founded by the adrian dominican sisters. with a liberal arts tradition, barry university is a scholarly community committed to the highest academic standards in undergraduate,…

Education
5
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
11
Illinois Institute of Technology

To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOE DIMAGGIO FOUNDATION: $206,000 · OtherJOE DIMAGGIO FOUNDATIONGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FOUNDATIONJCS: $93,000 · OtherJCSAVENTURA TURNBERRY JEWISH CENTER BETH JACOB INC: $90,000 · OtherAVENTURA TURNBERRY JEWISH CENTER BETH JACOB INCJAFCO: $90,000 · OtherJAFCOUniversity of Michigan: $80,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherHelping Hands: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · Other+8 more: $107,000 · Other+8 moreUniversity of Miami: $239,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiEARTHROSE INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · EducationEARTHROSE INSTITUTE INCNova Southeastern University Inc: $30,000 · EducationNova Southeastern Universi…Broward Education Foundation Inc: $25,000 · EducationBroward Education Foundati…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC: $48,000 · HealthPILOT LIGHT: $5,000 · HealthCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $18,000 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 · InternationalPatriot Service Dogs Inc: $29,000 · AnimalsCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$973,000Education$349,000Health$53,000Youth Development$40,000International$32,000Animals$29,000Human Services$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Miami: $239,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $80,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHROSE INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPatriot Service Dogs Inc: $29,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Schools: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPILOT LIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHROSE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Patriot Service Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds Broward Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds University Schools ↗
  • Who funds PILOT LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Broward Education Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gordon Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gordon Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gordon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph