Skip to content
Good Sports Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Good Sports Inc

The mission is to increase youth participation in sports, fitness, and recreational progams by targeting one of the major obstacles limiting participation - access to sports equipment.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
—
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
—
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

Grant detail is referenced in an attached schedule not included in the e-file. Total reported in the filing: $12,531,021.

$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$14M
Total assets
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
2
Matteson Youth Athletic Association

Sports program for youth

Recreation & Sports
3
Dugout Youth Development

Alowing kids Youth sports and competitio

Youth Development
4
Dhs Club

Youth sports - physical education & skills development

—
5
Stratford High School Lacrosse

Youth Sports activities

Recreation & Sports
6
Team Tyus

Provide a competitive and supportive environment for youth athletes to develop as basketball players and learn important life lessons along the way.

Recreation & Sports
7
Gladiator Sports

Youth development

Recreation & Sports
8
I Got Next Youth Sports Inc

Youth academic and physical health devel

Human Services
9
Marauders Baseball Club

Youth Baseball league

—
10
Helping Hands Youth Center

Youth Athletic program

Youth Development
11
Just Amazing Youth Sports Inc
Youth Development
12
Leadership Development of Our Youth in Sports

Recretion and education for kids

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridgewater Homes Assisted Living I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George W Bush Fou…Womens Sports Foundat…Laureus Sport for Goo…Dick's Sporting Goods…Digital Promise GlobalThe Mr Holland's Opus…Save the Music Founda…Justin J Watt Foundat…Round It Up America I…United States Soccer …GenYOUTH IncorporatedProject Lead the Way …
The George W Bush FoundationTX57.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George W Bush Foundation · Womens Sports Foundation · Laureus Sport for Good Foundation USA · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Digital Promise Global · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Save the Music Foundation · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · Round It Up America Inc · United States Soccer Foundation Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Project Lead the Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home