Skip to content
Good Shepherd Community Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Good Shepherd Community Health Foundation

To enhance the quality of life and general health of residents living in the west umatilla and morrow county communities in support of the mission of good shepherd health care system.

$391k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$412kRecreation & Sports$321kEducation$201kPublic Safety & Disaster$134kFood & Nutrition$86kYouth Development$84kHuman Services$78kHousing & Shelter$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $149,150, the rows itemized in this filing. The $390,860 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $241,710 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MADE TO THRIVE$31,500
GREATER HERMISTON COMMUNITY FOUND$27,500
UMATILLA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1$24,750
GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM$12,500
STANFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
CITY OF HEPPNER$10,000
HERMISTON JR BULLDOGS FOOTBALL$9,800
ART CENTER EAST$9,600
HERMISTON PARKS & RECREATION$7,500
COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP DINNER$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EASTERN OREGON MISSION DBA MARTHA'S HOUSE: $12k → 10%EASTERN OREGON MISSION DBA MARTHA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%EASTERN OREGON MISSION: $13k → 12%HERMISTON LIONS CLUB: $12k → 12%SWEET POTATO'S CLOSET: $10k → 12%EASTERN OREGON MISSIONAGAPE HOUSE: $7k → 12%EASTERN OREGON MISSION: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
24

Total granted

$1.1M
$294k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $365k · revenue +138%
  • BM
    BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +116%
  • UH
    UMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SS
    STEPPING STONES ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $46k · revenue +69%
  • HS
    HERMISTON SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -60%
  • BR
    BOARDMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
2
Estacada Area Food Bank

To provide food for local community families.

Human Services
3
Good Samaritan of the Ozarks

Good samaritan of the ozarks exists to communicate the love of god, through christ, to the people in our community by meeting their emergency needs.

Human Services
4
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—
5
Emergency Community Food Pantry

To provide food to those in need due to emergency situations.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Gresham Senior Center

Gresham Senior Center increases senior citizen's ablility to remain involved and active in the community. We offer education, recreation, health and social programs to serve seniors and their families in the East Multnomah County.

Human Services
7
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
8
Henderson County Food Pantry

Providing food to the needy

—
9
Eastern Oregon Healthy Living Alliance

The organization's mission is to support and provide the implementaion of the Regional Community Health Improvement Plan and to support community health development initiatives in Eastern Oregon.

Health
10
Mendocino Coast Hospitality Center

Provide basic shelter services to the community's poor, those without food and shelter.

—
11
Gem County Senior Community Center Corporation

To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors

Human Services
12
Harney County Senior and Community Servi

Harney county senior and community services center actively seeks sources of funding that benefits senior citizens of low income and generally, advocates for the older population as a whole.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hermiston Lions Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Made to Thrive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HERMISTON: $127,500 · OtherCITY OF HERMISTONBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $64,689 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONUMATILLA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT: $60,160 · OtherUMATILLA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTHERMISTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $35,100 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC: $33,195 · OtherHERMISTON SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INC: $30,000 · OtherMorrow County School District: $26,865 · OtherCITY OF UMATILLA: $26,740 · OtherBOARDMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION: $23,500 · Other+27 more: $274,953 · Other+27 moreGOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $365,461 · HealthGOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SY…MADE TO THRIVE: $159,200 · Youth DevelopmentMADE TO THRI…EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $64,689 · EducationUMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC: $18,335 · EducationEASTERN OREGON MISSION: $48,498 · Human ServicesHERMISTON LIONS CLUB INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesSWEET POTATO'S CLOSET: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES ALLIANCE INC: $46,380 · Housing & ShelterGREATER HERMISTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,500 · PhilanthropyHERMISTON KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $5,307 · Philanthropy
Other$702,702Health$365,461Youth Development$159,200Education$83,024Human Services$70,498Housing & Shelter$46,380Philanthropy$32,807

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $365,461 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMADE TO THRIVE: $159,200 over 9y, 14% of budgetEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $64,689 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $64,689 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetEASTERN OREGON MISSION: $48,498 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetSTEPPING STONES ALLIANCE INC: $46,380 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC: $33,195 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHERMISTON SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGREATER HERMISTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC: $18,335 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF EASTERN OREGON: $17,374 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSTANFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER: $11,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetSWEET POTATO'S CLOSET: $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetEASTERN OREGON REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL dba ART CENTER EAST: $9,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBOARDMAN FOOD PANTRY: $7,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetTHE CONTINGENT: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERMISTON KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $5,307 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds MADE TO THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN OREGON MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HERMISTON SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HERMISTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF EASTERN OREGON ↗
  • Who funds HERMISTON LIONS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds STANFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SWEET POTATO'S CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN OREGON REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL dba ART CENTER EAST ↗
  • Who funds BOARDMAN FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE CONTINGENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Lamb Weston Charitabl…The Ford Family Found…Changex United States…The Roundhouse Founda…Umatilla Electric Coo…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Good Shepherd Health …Blue Mountain Communi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR29.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Changex United States Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · Umatilla Electric Cooperative · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Good Shepherd Health Care System · Blue Mountain Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Shepherd Community Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Shepherd Community Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 44%
  • Domestic Violence Services Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Umatilla-Morrow Headstart Inc: 44% of income from government
  • The Contingent: 5% of income from government
  • Eastern Oregon Regional Arts Council dba Art Center East: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Shepherd Community Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home