Skip to content

· Public charity

Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc

To operate exclusively to steward philanthropic gifts for the good samaritan hospital.

$3.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$34MEducation$4.7M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $299k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.5M
$203,831
Median grant
1
States reached
$116M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO$1,890,366
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC$1,107,137
GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE$453,478
TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE$203,831
BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC$95,257
TRIHEALTH INC$12,701
TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP$8,672
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $2.1M → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $416k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $131k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $19k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $9k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $5.0M → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $3.0M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $2.9M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $2.7M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $2.5M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $2.0M → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $1.9M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $1.9M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $1.3M → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $1.1M → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC: $1.1M → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $1.0M → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $882k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $778k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $673k → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $649k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $630k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $625k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $523k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE: $522k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $453k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $435k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $420k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $355k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $349k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE: $314k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $306k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $213k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE: $204k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $197k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $183k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $163k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $115k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $113k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $95k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $83k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $36k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $19k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $17k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $14k → 16%TRIHEALTH INC: $13k → 16%BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $9k → 16%TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 6 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$37M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17M · revenue +76%
  • TI
    TRIHEALTH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +44%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • BH
    BETHESDA HEALTHCARE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
2
Mccullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Incorporated

Acute care hospital facility delivering quality services to our patients and the communities we serve.

Health
3
Bethesda Inc

To be a leader in contributing to the improvement of health/well-being in the cincinnati community.

Health
4
Guthrie Towanda Memorial Hospital

The provision of charitable healthcare services to residents of the surrounding community on an in-patient and out-patient basis in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin.

—
5
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
6
Trinity Health System Group

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
7
Trinity Hospital Twin City

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
8
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
9
Christ's Hospital
—
10
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
11
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc

To operate exclusively to steward philanthropic gifts for the good samaritan hospital.

Health
12
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trihealth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trihealth Physician Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $17,045,737 · HealthTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIOGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC: $1,107,137 · HealthBETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $1,062,898 · HealthTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE: $1,039,346 · Health+2 more: $628,280 · HealthTRIHEALTH INC: $12,962,692 · ReligionTRIHEALTH INCGOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $4,716,193 · OtherGOOD SAMARITA…
Health$20,883,398Religion$12,962,692Other$4,716,193

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO: $17,045,737 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTRIHEALTH INC: $12,962,692 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $4,716,193 over 9y, 17% of budgetBETHESDA HOSPITAL INC: $1,062,898 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE: $1,039,346 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $622,246 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTHCARE INC: $6,034 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI OHIO ↗
  • Who funds TRIHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTHCARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bethesda Foundation IncOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bethesda Foundation Inc · Bethesda Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati’s filings →

    More from the funding graph