Skip to content
Good Samaritan Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Good Samaritan Hospital

We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.

$1.5M
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$958k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$2.6MCommunity Improvement$869kPhilanthropy$104kHuman Services$33kEducation$19kReligion$17kArts & Culture$14kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $1,112,416, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,489,125 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $376,709 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
  • $250k+1 grant · $958k
$16,848
Median grant
1
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS$958,385
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL$29,754
REACH OUT MONTGOMERY COUNTY$28,955
UNITED WAY OF GREATER DAYTON AREA$19,200
DAYTON FOUNDATION$18,624
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$16,848
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$12,510
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$8,230
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$7,320
ST PETER CATHOLIC CHURCH - 6161$6,840
DAYTON RIGHT TO LIFE FOUNDATION$5,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DAYBREAK: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$2.6M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+13%

Still filing today

88%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2.3M · revenue +147%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $77k · revenue +96%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • CD
    CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $869k · revenue +13%
  • YD
    YWCA Dayton
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +10%
  • MS
    MARY SCOTT NURSING
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
2
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
3
Fidelity Health Care

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital

We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.

—
5
Dayton Children's Hospital

The relentless pursuit of optimal health for every child within our reach.

Health
6
Hospice of Dayton Inc

The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…

Human Services
7
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
8
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
9
Dayton Development Coalition

The mission of the coalition is to recruit, expand and retain jobs in the dayton region. the coalition focuses on growing the 14-county dayton region and bolsters job creation and opportunity by supporting entrepreneurial activity,…

—
10
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
11
Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc

Our mission: to lead our communities to well-being, one person at a time. this mission is carried out by serving the people of a multi-county service area in reference to their current and future needs for health care services. our major…

Health
12
Marietta Health Foundation

The memorial health foundation encourages philanthropic support of marietta memorial hospital and related services. activities include raising funds, fund stewardship and making grants to improve health care in the mid-ohio valley.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area; the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Greater Miami Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS: $2,317,672 · HealthFIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS+6 more: $220,840 · Health+6 moreCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $869,262 · Community ImprovementCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPO…YWCA Dayton: $27,140 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON: $25,010 · OtherMARY SCOTT NURSING: $24,480 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA: $24,380 · OtherST PETER CHURCH: $11,940 · OtherWright State University: $11,700 · OtherADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC: $8,000 · OtherSOUTHBROOK CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $5,280 · OtherHOUSE OF BREAD: $6,000 · OtherDAYTON RIGHT TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $5,750 · OtherDAYBREAK INC: $5,580 · OtherDAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY: $60,600 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $18,624 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $7,920 · Arts & CultureDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $6,260 · Arts & CultureWright State University Foundation Inc: $7,320 · EducationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GREATER MIAMI VALLEY INC: $6,800 · Youth Development
Health$2,538,512Community Improvement$869,262Other$155,260Philanthropy$79,224Arts & Culture$14,180Education$7,320Youth Development$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS: $2,317,672 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $869,262 over 1y, 24% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $76,662 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $67,896 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetDAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY: $60,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $27,252 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON: $25,010 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMARY SCOTT NURSING: $24,480 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA: $24,380 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGID'S PATH INC: $24,240 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $18,624 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,290 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEquitas Health Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $7,920 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWright State University Foundation Inc: $7,320 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GREATER MIAMI VALLEY INC: $6,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY: $6,260 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAYTON RIGHT TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $5,750 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Miami Valley HospitalThe Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Dayton Foundation Plu…Mathile Family Founda…The CareSource Founda…Frank M Tait Foundati…Dayton Children's Hos…WPCU Sunshine Communi…The Dayton Power and …Levin Family Foundati…Synchrony Foundation
Miami Valley HospitalOH43.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Miami Valley Hospital · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Mathile Family Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · Frank M Tait Foundation · Dayton Children's Hospital · WPCU Sunshine Community Fund · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Levin Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Samaritan Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Samaritan Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Good Samaritan Hospital?

    Find your warmest path to Good Samaritan Hospital through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Samaritan Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home