· Public charity
Good Life Broadcasting Inc
Our mission is to share christ in compelling ways.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $515k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC | $500,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $500,000 |
| OPERATION BLESSING INTERNATIONAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $500,000 |
| CALVARY ASSEMBLY OF GOD | $400,000 |
| SANFORD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC | $350,000 |
| FOUR WINDS ECCLESIA INC (YOUTH WITH A MISSION ORLANDO) | $164,920 |
| MAN IN THE MIRROR | $100,000 |
| COMPASS-FINANCES GOD'S WAY | $100,000 |
| GMH PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC | $100,000 |
| BETTER MAN MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC | $35,000 |
| FLORIDA FAMILY POLICY COUNCIL INC | $1,350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $660k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Good Life Broadcasting Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 76% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $665k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC2× · 2017–2020 · $3.5M · revenue +59%
- NHNathaniel's Hope Inc2× · 2017–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +16% · 29% of their budget
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA INC3× · 2017–2021 · $1.7M · revenue +18%
Funded once
- OUORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INCone grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue -3%
- RORIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER OF ORLANDO INCone grant, 2017 · $200k
- USUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEone grant, 2017 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Christian publishing company
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.
Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…
To reach gods elect with the gospel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Life Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Nathaniel's Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SERVANTS INC ↗
- Who funds GMH Property Holdings Inc ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds SANFORD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA FAMILY VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds COMPASS-FINANCES GOD'S WAY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER MAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAN IN THE MIRROR INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Resource Network Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HELP FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bob and Ruthie Harrell Foundation · Servant Foundation · Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Central Florida Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · For Giving Foundation Inc · Acahand Foundation · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Good Life Broadcasting Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Good Life Broadcasting Inc?
Find your warmest path to Good Life Broadcasting Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.