Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goldner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$573k
Granted FY2024still arriving
224
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MHealth$213kEducation$137kInternational$109kRecreation & Sports$53kPhilanthropy$45kYouth Development$31kCivil Rights$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 224 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k210 grants · $274k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $197k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Israel of Los Angeles$101,800
Maayon Yisroel$25,500
Bais Medrash of Hancock Park$25,343
Tehila Foundation$25,000
JETS$18,000
The Central Fund of Israel$18,000
Chabad Chayil$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Cong Bnei Yechiel$10,800
Tomchei Shabbos$10,000
American Freinds of Mosdos Amram Ch$10,000
Friends of Nahal Haredi$10,000
Kollel Kinyan Torah$10,000
Bikur Cholim$10,000
Chabad of Oxnard$8,988
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Zevulun Foundation: $500 → 9%Areivim Institute: $3k → 11%Ahavas Chesed Fund: $680 → 20%Keren Hatzedaka: $50 → 11%Bais Chesed LA: $1k → 14%Ner Malka Inc: $250 → 14%Bais Chesed LA: $500 → 14%American Friends of Emanuel Inc: $500 → 20%Global Kindness: $180 → 14%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%Matan B Seter Bambi Inc: $180 → 20%Marbeh Tzedaka: $500 → 14%Bobbie's Place: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MD
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 213 repeat orgs$551k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

213 repeat relationships: 136 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 86 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

213
184

Total granted

$2.3M
$341k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+1%

Still filing today

20%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +116%
  • LD
    LANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +90%
  • BY
    Bais Yaakov School For Girls
    6× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • MK
    MESIVTA KEREN ORAH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • C3
    CONG 3PRI HOORETZ
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
9
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
12
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Ora. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 486 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/106
Grantees still filing
55/106
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEIS MEDRASH OF HANCOCK PARK: $143,013 · OtherBEIS MEDRASH OF HANCOCK PARKMAAYON YISROEL INC: $141,485 · OtherMAAYON YISROEL INCYoung Israel of Los Angeles: $101,800 · Other+163 more: $1,870,519 · Other+163 moreMERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $68,400 · ReligionNY AFO Meomek Halev Inc: $17,500 · ReligionGindi Maimonides Academy: $10,200 · ReligionFRIENDS OF TSFAT: $9,000 · ReligionLong Island Torah Network: $8,750 · ReligionKollel - Los Angeles: $5,630 · Religion+6 more: $19,730 · ReligionBIKUR CHOLIM: $67,333 · HealthLANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $50,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $11,140 · HealthBais Yaakov School For Girls: $26,600 · EducationMESIVTA KEREN ORAH: $25,000 · EducationYESHIVA TALPIOT INC: $11,000 · EducationYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $7,750 · EducationMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $7,300 · EducationMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $3,000 · EducationBAIS TORAS MENACHEM: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,980 · EducationCentral Fund of Israel: $18,000 · InternationalAmerican Yedidim Inc: $11,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $10,180 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC: $5,200 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc: $4,400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $2,430 · InternationalTehila Foundation: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,920 · PhilanthropySHUVU RETURN INC: $3,330 · PhilanthropyImanu: $2,300 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $2,200 · Philanthropy
Other$2,256,817Religion$139,210Health$128,473Education$85,630International$51,210Housing & Shelter$25,000Philanthropy$11,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $68,400 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM: $67,333 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetLANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBais Yaakov School For Girls: $26,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA KEREN ORAH: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTehila Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNY AFO Meomek Halev Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetDOR YESHURIM INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $11,140 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Yedidim Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA TALPIOT INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJERUSALEM DENTAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,360 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $10,180 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHATZOLAH OF LOS ANGELES: $9,430 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF TSFAT: $9,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetLong Island Torah Network: $8,750 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $7,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $7,610 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $7,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $6,107 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKollel - Los Angeles: $5,630 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORA: $5,180 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBNOS DEVORAH HIGH SCHOOL: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc: $4,400 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES: $4,320 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $4,240 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $4,210 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBais Medrash of Rockland County Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,920 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,330 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS TORAS MENACHEM: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWest Coast Vaad Hachesed: $2,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAREIVIM INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $2,430 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetImanu: $2,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMASBIA: $2,196 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH: $1,980 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS CHESED LA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
  • Who funds LANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov School For Girls ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA KEREN ORAH ↗
  • Who funds Tehila Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA75.5× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Chavi F Hertz Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Jay Morris Foundation Inc · Hager Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Ahavas Avraham Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goldner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 486 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goldner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph